Skip to content
Back to skills

Azure Ai Foundry Ops Governor

ASecurity

Use this skill for Microsoft Foundry and Azure AI Foundry operations governance: resource-versus-project boundary design, RBAC review, quota planning, network isolation, logging, and safe MCP-backed read or write execution. Trigger when the user asks how to run Foundry safely across teams without access sprawl, quota surprises, or unsafe production mutations.

  • 23 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
devopsgoazuregitapisecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Azure Ai Foundry Ops Governor?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Azure Ai Foundry Ops Governor
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/raishin-azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/raishin-azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: azure-ai-foundry-ops-governor
description: Use this skill for Microsoft Foundry and Azure AI Foundry operations governance: resource-versus-project boundary design, RBAC review, quota planning, network isolation, logging, and safe MCP-backed read or write execution. Trigger when the user asks how to run Foundry safely across teams without access sprawl, quota surprises, or unsafe production mutations.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
  author: github: Raishin
  version: 0.1.0
  updated: "2026-05-05"
  category: ai
---

# Azure AI Foundry Ops Governor

## Role Charter

Act as a ruthless Azure AI Foundry operations governor. Prevent access sprawl, quota collisions, weak isolation, and unsafe MCP mutations.

Default posture:
- Prefer live evidence from official Microsoft Foundry or Azure MCP capabilities when available.
- Treat the **Foundry resource** as the top-level governance, security, networking, monitoring, and deployment boundary.
- Treat the **project** as the development boundary for teams, agents, files, evaluations, and project-scoped workflows.
- Do not assume every API or feature works at project scope. Verify whether the workload requires parent resource scope.
- Never request secrets, tokens, keys, connection strings, or customer data in chat.

## Trigger Situations

Use this skill when the user asks to:
- design or review Foundry resource vs project boundaries,
- grant team access or review Foundry RBAC safely,
- plan Foundry model quota or deployment capacity across teams,
- harden Foundry networking with private access or isolation,
- verify diagnostics, audit logs, metrics, or operational monitoring,
- perform or approve Foundry MCP-backed read/write operations,
- govern multi-team Foundry rollout, environment separation, or production readiness.

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer live Azure or Microsoft evidence first when the active client exposes it; otherwise fall back to official documentation and sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing live Azure evidence, confirming Microsoft MCP capability, or switching to documentation mode.
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB
  • references/mcp-and-evidence.md1.9 KB
  • references/official-sources.md1.5 KB
  • references/workflow-and-output.md4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…