Skip to content
Back to skills

Ab Test Setup

ASecurity

Use when designing an A/B or split test: define the hypothesis, control and variants, estimate sample size, verify tracking, and predeclare metrics and stopping rules.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
ai-agentspythongorailsgit

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add ranbot-ai/awesome-skills --skill ab-test-setup --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ab Test Setup?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ab Test Setup
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ranbot-ai-ab-test-setup/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ranbot-ai-ab-test-setup)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ab-test-setup
description: Use when designing an A/B or split test: define the hypothesis, control and variants, estimate sample size, verify tracking, and predeclare metrics and stopping rules. 
category: Document Processing
source: antigravity
tags: [python, ai, design, document, cro]
url: https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/ab-test-setup
---


# A/B Test Setup

## 1️⃣ Purpose & Scope

Define an experiment that can answer a specific product question, and verify its assumptions before exposing users. This procedure cannot guarantee validity by itself.

- Documents the stopping rule
- Estimates sample needs under stated assumptions
- Makes the hypothesis and decision criteria reviewable

---

## 2️⃣ Pre-Requisites

You must have:

- A clear user problem
- Access to an analytics source
- Roughly estimated traffic volume

### Hypothesis Quality Checklist

A valid hypothesis includes:

- Observation or evidence
- Single, specific change
- Directional expectation
- Defined audience
- Measurable success criteria

---

## 3️⃣ Hypothesis Lock (Hard Gate)

Before designing variants or metrics, you MUST:

- Present the **final hypothesis**
- Specify:
  - Target audience
  - Primary metric
  - Expected direction of effect
  - Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE)

Use the hypothesis already agreed in the task. If a launch-critical choice is missing, present the concrete choice for confirmation while continuing independent analysis. Do not repeatedly request approval for a decision already authorized.

---

## 4️⃣ Assumptions & Validity Check (Mandatory)

Explicitly list assumptions about:

- Traffic stability
- User independence
- Metric reliability
- Randomization quality
- External factors (seasonality, campaigns, releases)

If assumptions are weak or violated:

- Warn the user
- Recommend delaying or redesigning the test

---

## 5️⃣ Test Type Selection

Choose the simplest valid test:

- **A/B Test** – single change, two variants
- **A/B/n Test** – multiple variants, higher traffic required
- **Multivariate Test (MVT)** – interaction effects, very high traffic
- **Split URL Test** – major structural changes

Default to **A/B** unless there is a clear reason otherwise.

---

## 6️⃣ Metrics Definition

#### Primary Metric (Mandatory)

- Single metric used to evaluate success
- Directly tied to the hypothesis
- Pre-defined and frozen before launch

#### Secondary Metrics

- Provide context
- Explain _why_ results occurred
- Must not override the primary metric

#### Guardrail Metrics

- Metrics that must not degrade
- Used to prevent harmful wins
- Trigger test stop if significantly negative

---

## 7️⃣ Sample Size & Duration

Define upfront:

- Baseline rate
- MDE
- Significance level alpha (often 0.05, corresponding to 95% confidence)
- Statistical power (typically 80%)

Estimate:

- Required sample size per variant
- Expected test duration

**Do NOT proceed without a realistic sample size estimate.**

---

### Tracking Verification (Required before Gate 8)

Before entering the Execution Readiness Gate below, run through this checklist to make "Tracking is verified" mean something concrete:

1. **Event firing:** Trigger each event the primary and secondary metrics depend on (sign-up, add-to-cart, custom event) on staging or a debug page, and confirm it arrives within that pipeline’s documented latency; record the observed delay.
2. **Variant attribution:** Verify that the variant assignment ID is attached to every fired event — not just the entry event. Use your analytics' raw event view to compare a sample of 5+ events per variant.
3. **De-duplication:** Confirm that a user reloading the page does not cause double-counted events. Use a stable event/transaction ID and document cross-client/server deduplication; a variant label alone is not a unique event key.
4. **Sample randomization:** Check sample-ratio mismatch against the configured allocation with a pre-specified statistical check and adequate records. A fixed ±5% band on 100 records is not a valid universal randomization test. Inspect assignment stability, unit independence and missing exposure records.
5. **Guardrail metric pipeline:** Each guardrail metric defined in §6️⃣ must have a working dashboard or alert by the time the test launches.

If any of the above fails, stop and resolve it before Gate 8.

---

## 8️⃣ Execution Readiness Gate (Hard Stop)

You may proceed to implementation **only if all are true**:

- Hypothesis is locked
- Primary metric is frozen
- Sample size is calculated
- Test duration is defined
- Guardrails are set
- Tracking is verified

If any item is missing, stop and resolve it.

---

## Running the Test

### During the Test

**DO:**

- Monitor technical health
- Document external factors

**DO NOT:**

- Stop early due to “good-looking” results
- Change variants mid-test
- Add new traffic sources
- Redefine success criteria

---

## Analyzing Results

### Analysis Discipline

When interpreting results:

- Do NOT generalize beyond the tested population
- Do NOT claim causality beyond the tested change
- Do NOT override guardrail failures
- Separate statistical significance from business judgment

### Interpretation Outcomes

| Result               | Action                                 |
| -------------------- | -------------------------------------- |
| Significant positive 

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…