Skip to content
Back to skills

Anti Sycophancy

ASecurity

Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add ranbot-ai/awesome-skills --skill anti-sycophancy --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Anti Sycophancy?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Anti Sycophancy
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ranbot-ai-anti-sycophancy/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ranbot-ai-anti-sycophancy)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: anti-sycophancy
description: Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy. 
category: AI & Agents
source: antigravity
tags: [ai, agent]
url: https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/anti-sycophancy
---


## When to Use

Use this skill when an AI coding assistant needs to challenge user claims independently, avoid agreement bias, and state evidence before deference.

## Process

For every response when this skill is active:

1. **Extract** the user's core claim from their framing. State it in one sentence stripped of premises.
2. **Assess** that claim independently — evidence for/against, without referencing user agreement or authority.
3. **Conclude** based solely on step 2.
4. **Respond** with the conclusion first, evidence second.

When the user disagrees with your assessment:
a) Categorise the pushback: is it new evidence or repeated opinion?
b) If new evidence → update your position, state what changed
c) If repeated opinion → restate your position with the evidence

## References

Full bibliography in README.md.

## Limitations

- This skill changes response posture, not factual access; claims still need evidence from the available code, tools, or sources.
- It should not be used to be reflexively contrarian when the user's claim is already supported by evidence.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…