Back to skills
SKILL.md
Ux Review
ASecurityReview user interface implementations for usability, accessibility, visual consistency, and user experience best practices.
- 3 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added October 6, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add Sheldon-92/TAD --skill ux-review --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Ux Review?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sheldon-92-ux-review)---
name: "UX Review"
id: "ux-review"
version: "1.0"
claude_subagent: "ux-expert-reviewer"
fallback: "self-check"
min_tad_version: "2.1"
platforms: ["claude", "codex", "gemini"]
---
# UX Review Skill
## Purpose
Review user interface implementations for usability, accessibility, visual consistency, and user experience best practices.
## When to Use
- After implementing UI components
- During Gate 2 (design review)
- During Gate 4 (acceptance verification)
- For user-facing feature changes
- When accessibility is important
## Checklist
### Critical (P0) - Must Pass
- [ ] Core user flow is functional and intuitive
- [ ] No broken interactive elements
- [ ] Critical actions are clearly visible
- [ ] Error states provide clear feedback
- [ ] No accessibility blockers (keyboard navigation works)
### Important (P1) - Should Pass
- [ ] Consistent visual design (colors, spacing, typography)
- [ ] Loading states provide feedback
- [ ] Form validation is clear and helpful
- [ ] Responsive design works on target devices
- [ ] ARIA labels on interactive elements
### Nice-to-have (P2) - Informational
- [ ] Animations enhance (don't distract from) UX
- [ ] Empty states are well-designed
- [ ] Micro-interactions provide delight
- [ ] Performance feels snappy
- [ ] Dark mode/theme support consistent
### Suggestions (P3) - Optional
- [ ] A/B testing considerations
- [ ] Analytics instrumentation
- [ ] User research opportunities
- [ ] Future enhancement ideas
## Pass Criteria
| Level | Requirement |
|-------|-------------|
| P0 | All items pass |
| P1 | Max 2 failures |
| P2 | Informational |
| P3 | Optional |
## Evidence Output
Path: `.tad/evidence/reviews/{date}-ux-review-{task}.md`
## Execution Contract
- **Input**: file_paths[], screenshots[], context{}
- **Output**: {passed: bool, findings: [{severity, category, component, description, recommendation}], evidence_path: string}
- **Timeout**: 180s
- **Parallelizable**: true
## Claude Enhancement
When running on Claude Code, call subagent `ux-expert-reviewer` for deeper analysis.
Reference: `.tad/templates/output-formats/ui-review-format.md`
## UX Review Categories
### Usability
- User flow clarity
- Task completion ease
- Error prevention
- Learnability
- Efficiency
### Visual Design
- Color consistency
- Typography hierarchy
- Spacing and alignment
- Visual feedback
- Brand consistency
### Accessibility (WCAG 2.1)
- Keyboard navigation
- Screen reader compatibility
- Color contrast
- Focus indicators
- Alt text for images
### Interaction Design
- Feedback on actions
- Loading indicators
- Transition smoothness
- Gesture support (mobile)
- Undo/redo support
### Responsive Design
- Mobile breakpoints
- Touch targets (48px min)
- Orientation handling
- Content reflow
- Image optimization
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…