Skip to content
Back to skills

Code Review

ASecurity

Code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification. Use when receiving code review feedback, completing tasks requiring review, or before making completion claims.

  • 21 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 1 copy
  • 14 views
  • Added February 11, 2026
developmentgocode-review

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add siviter-xyz/dot-agent --skill code-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Code Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Code Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/siviter-xyz-code-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/siviter-xyz-code-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: code-review
description: Code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification. Use when receiving code review feedback, completing tasks requiring review, or before making completion claims.
license: MIT
---

# Code Review

Guide proper code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification over performative responses.

## Overview

Code review requires three distinct practices:

1. **Receiving feedback** - Technical evaluation over performative agreement
2. **Requesting reviews** - Systematic review processes
3. **Verification gates** - Evidence before any completion claims

## Core Principle

**Technical correctness over social comfort.** Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Evidence before claims.

## When to Use

### Receiving Feedback
- Receiving code review comments from any source
- Feedback seems unclear or technically questionable
- Multiple review items need prioritization
- External reviewer lacks full context
- Suggestion conflicts with existing decisions

### Requesting Review
- Completing tasks in subagent-driven development (after EACH task)
- Finishing major features or refactors
- Before merging to main branch
- Stuck and need fresh perspective
- After fixing complex bugs

### Verification Gates
- About to claim tests pass, build succeeds, or work is complete
- Before committing, pushing, or creating PRs
- Moving to next task
- Any statement suggesting success/completion

## Quick Decision Tree

```
SITUATION?
│
├─ Received feedback
│  ├─ Unclear items? → STOP, ask for clarification first
│  ├─ From human partner? → Understand, then implement
│  └─ From external reviewer? → Verify technically before implementing
│
├─ Completed work
│  ├─ Major feature/task? → Request systematic review
│  └─ Before merge? → Request systematic review
│
└─ About to claim status
   ├─ Have fresh verification? → State claim WITH evidence
   └─ No fresh verification? → RUN verification command first
```

## CI Verification

Before any completion claim or commit:
- Run CI checks (types, tests, lint)
- Prefer single CI command if available
- Verify all checks pass
- Do not proceed if checks fail

## References

For detailed protocols, see:
- `references/receiving-feedback.md` - How to handle code review feedback
- `references/requesting-review.md` - Systematic review processes
- `references/verification-gates.md` - Evidence before claims protocol

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB
  • references/receiving-feedback.md1.4 KB
  • references/requesting-review.md1.1 KB
  • references/verification-gates.md1.5 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…