Skip to content
Back to skills

Analysis Plan

ASecurity

Plan an analysis so the question, the data, and the decision rule are fixed before the slicing starts. Use when the user mentions analysis plan, data analysis request, what should we analyze, analytics brief, or asks for a analysis plan. Data and analytics skill by Yasir Jilani.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 30, 2026
ai-agentspythonawsgitapi

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 30, 2026

npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill analysis-plan --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Analysis Plan?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Analysis Plan
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/syasj-analysis-plan/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-analysis-plan)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: analysis-plan
description: "Plan an analysis so the question, the data, and the decision rule are fixed before the slicing starts. Use when the user mentions analysis plan, data analysis request, what should we analyze, analytics brief, or asks for a analysis plan. Data and analytics skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
  author: Yasir Jilani
  version: "1.0.0"
  domain: data
---

<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
     Edit the 'analysis-plan' entry in source/, then run:
       python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
     See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->

# Analysis Plan

Plan an analysis so the question, the data, and the decision rule are fixed before the slicing starts.

## When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user:

- analysis plan
- data analysis request
- what should we analyze
- analytics brief

## When not to use this skill

- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.

## Professional boundary

Do not invent numbers. If a source file is missing, say so. Distinguish observation from inference. Do not re-identify private data to make a point.

## Operating boundaries

- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.

## Inputs to collect

- The decision
- The data available
- The comparison they care about
- The deadline

## Workflow


### 1. Step 1

Restate the decision. An analysis with no decision is a tour.
### 2. Write the comparison

against what period, segment, or control.
### 3. Step 3

List the data you have and the data you do not. Do not plan around a table nobody can access.
### 4. Step 4

Pre-commit the cut that would change the decision.
### 5. Step 5

Name biases in the sample the user described.
### 6. Step 6

Set the deliverable as a memo, not a notebook dump, unless they asked for the notebook too.

## Output

Deliver a **analysis plan**.

- Purpose of this analysis plan, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.

## Quality bar

- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.

## Example

### Scenario

Noah Berger, data lead at Fieldnote in Edmonton, needs an analysis plan by 30 September 2026. A team wants to know why conversion fell and plans to look at twelve dimensions with no primary comparison.

### Example data

```text
From: Noah Berger, data lead
Organization: Fieldnote, Edmonton
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026

A team wants to know why conversion fell and plans to look at twelve dimensions with no primary comparison.

The decision: A team wants to know why conversion fell and plans to look at twelve dimensions with no primary comparison
The data available: orders_daily, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached
The comparison they care about: orders_daily, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached
The deadline: 30 September 2026
```

### Example outcome

**Analysis plan**
To: Noah Berger, data lead, Fieldnote
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026

**Decision**
A plan with one primary comparison, the missing data called out, and a decision rule written first.

**What the file supports**

| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The decision | A team wants to know why conversion fell and plans to look at twelve dimensions with no primary comparison | Needs confirmation |
| The data available | orders_daily, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached | Carried into the draft |
| The comparison they care about | orders_daily, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached | Carried into the draft |
| The deadline | 30 September 2026 | Needs confirmation |

**How this draft was built**

**1. Restate the decision. An analysis with no decision is a tour**

**2. Write the comparison**  
against what period, segment, or control.

**3. List the data you have and the data you do not. Do not plan around a table nobody can access**

**4. Pre-commit the cut that would change the decision**

**5. Name biases in the sample the user described**

**Deliberately not done**
- Slicing until a flattering story appears.
- Assuming a dataset you cannot see.
- A notebook with no decision.

**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.

Next: Noah Berger by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.

## Anti-patterns

- Slicing until a flattering story appears
- Assuming a dataset you cannot see
- A notebook with no decision

## Related skills

- `experiment-readout`
- `decision-memo-from-data`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…