Produce a sales forecast from evidence categories, not from a sum of hope. Use when the user mentions sales forecast, commit forecast, forecast call, what will we close, or asks for a forecast call note. Sales skill by Yasir Jilani.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Forecast Call?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-forecast-call)
---
name: forecast-call
description: "Produce a sales forecast from evidence categories, not from a sum of hope. Use when the user mentions sales forecast, commit forecast, forecast call, what will we close, or asks for a forecast call note. Sales skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: sales
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'forecast-call' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Forecast Call
Produce a sales forecast from evidence categories, not from a sum of hope.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- sales forecast
- commit forecast
- forecast call
- what will we close
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Sell honestly. Do not invent customer proof, discounts, or competitor facts. Do not write deceptive, phishing, or high-pressure scripts.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- Opportunities proposed for commit
- Evidence for each
- Historical slippage the user admits
- The number leadership already hopes for
## Workflow
### 1. Define categories
Commit, best case, and pipeline, in the user's definitions. If they have none, propose simple evidence rules and label them as a proposal.
### 2. Test commit
A commit needs a buyer process and a date the buyer influenced. Seller optimism is not commit.
### 3. Slippage
If they historically slip, show a haircut as their own history, not as a punishment. Do not invent a history.
### 4. Range
Give a range and the deals that swing it. A single number hides the risk.
### 5. Hope gap
If leadership's target exceeds the evidence, say so plainly. Do not backfill fake deals.
### 6. Actions
The two inspections that would change the number this week.
## Output
Deliver a **forecast call note**.
- Purpose of this forecast call note, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Samir Qureshi, account executive at Fieldnote in Edmonton, needs a forecast call note by 30 September 2026. Leadership wants a number that is 30 percent above the deals with a real buyer process.
### Example data
```text
From: Samir Qureshi, account executive
Organization: Fieldnote, Edmonton
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
Leadership wants a number that is 30 percent above the deals with a real buyer process.
Opportunities proposed for commit: Harbor Goods, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since
Evidence for each: one PDF, 2 pages, dated 14 September 2026
Historical slippage the user admits: Harbor Goods. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not
The number leadership already hopes for: Harbor Goods, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached
```
### Example outcome
**Forecast call note**
To: Samir Qureshi, account executive, Fieldnote
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
A forecast range, a clear gap to the hoped-for number, and two inspections, with no fake deals added to close the gap.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Opportunities proposed for commit | Harbor Goods, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since | Needs confirmation |
| Evidence for each | one PDF, 2 pages, dated 14 September 2026 | Carried into the draft |
| Historical slippage the user admits | Harbor Goods. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not | Carried into the draft |
| The number leadership already hopes for | Harbor Goods, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Define categories**
Commit, best case, and pipeline, in the user's definitions. If they have none, propose simple evidence rules and label them as a proposal.
**2. Test commit**
A commit needs a buyer process and a date the buyer influenced. Seller optimism is not commit.
**3. Slippage**
If they historically slip, show a haircut as their own history, not as a punishment. Do not invent a history.
**4. Range**
Give a range and the deals that swing it. A single number hides the risk.
**5. Hope gap**
If leadership's target exceeds the evidence, say so plainly. Do not backfill fake deals.
**Deliberately not done**
- Sandbagging or inflating to please a room.
- A single-point forecast with no swing deals.
- Inventing historical win rates.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Samir Qureshi by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Sandbagging or inflating to please a room.
- A single-point forecast with no swing deals.
- Inventing historical win rates.
## Related skills
- `pipeline-review`
- `qualification-meddic`