Write a proposal that restates the buyer's problem, the offer, the proof, and the ask, without invented ROI. Use when the user mentions write a proposal, sales proposal, statement of work narrative, proposal draft, or asks for a customer proposal. Sales skill by Yasir Jilani.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Proposal Writer?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-proposal-writer)
---
name: proposal-writer
description: "Write a proposal that restates the buyer's problem, the offer, the proof, and the ask, without invented ROI. Use when the user mentions write a proposal, sales proposal, statement of work narrative, proposal draft, or asks for a customer proposal. Sales skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: sales
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'proposal-writer' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Proposal Writer
Write a proposal that restates the buyer's problem, the offer, the proof, and the ask, without invented ROI.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- write a proposal
- sales proposal
- statement of work narrative
- proposal draft
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Sell honestly. Do not invent customer proof, discounts, or competitor facts. Do not write deceptive, phishing, or high-pressure scripts.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- The buyer's stated problem
- The offer and what is out of scope
- Proof you actually have
- Price and terms the user can stand behind
## Workflow
### 1. Mirror the problem
Use the buyer's language from discovery. If discovery was thin, say the proposal is premature.
### 2. Offer
What you will do, by when, and what you will not do. Ambiguous scope is a future dispute.
### 3. Proof
Only case facts the user supplied. No invented percentages.
### 4. Commercials
Price, term, and assumptions. Do not hide a material condition in a footnote.
### 5. Ask
The decision and the date. A proposal with no ask is a brochure.
### 6. Review
Flag claims that need the marketing-claims skill or counsel. Do not overpromise implementation.
## Output
Deliver a **customer proposal**.
- Purpose of this customer proposal, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Samir Qureshi, account executive at Fieldnote in Edmonton, needs a customer proposal by 30 September 2026. A seller wants a proposal for a buyer who has not confirmed the problem or the budget.
### Example data
```text
From: Samir Qureshi, account executive
Organization: Fieldnote, Edmonton
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
A seller wants a proposal for a buyer who has not confirmed the problem or the budget.
The buyer's stated problem: A seller wants a proposal for a buyer who has not confirmed the problem or the budget. Stated once, in the ask. Not written down anywhere else
The offer and what is out of scope: anything not named in the ask
Proof you actually have: one customer email, 14 September 2026, no attachment beyond that
Price and terms the user can stand behind: CAD 180
```
### Example outcome
**Customer proposal**
To: Samir Qureshi, account executive, Fieldnote
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
Refuses invented ROI and lists the two facts still required before price is presented as final.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The buyer's stated problem | A seller wants a proposal for a buyer who has not confirmed the problem or the budget. Stated once, in the ask. Not written down anywhere else | Needs confirmation |
| The offer and what is out of scope | anything not named in the ask | Carried into the draft |
| Proof you actually have | one customer email, 14 September 2026, no attachment beyond that | Carried into the draft |
| Price and terms the user can stand behind | CAD 180 | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Mirror the problem**
Use the buyer's language from discovery. If discovery was thin, say the proposal is premature.
**2. Offer**
What you will do, by when, and what you will not do. Ambiguous scope is a future dispute.
**3. Proof**
Only case facts the user supplied. No invented percentages.
**4. Commercials**
Price, term, and assumptions. Do not hide a material condition in a footnote.
**5. Ask**
The decision and the date. A proposal with no ask is a brochure.
**Deliberately not done**
- A ROI slide built from invented savings.
- Scope described only as 'full service'.
- A proposal written before the problem is known.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Samir Qureshi by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- A ROI slide built from invented savings.
- Scope described only as 'full service'.
- A proposal written before the problem is known.
## Related skills
- `discovery-call`
- `pricing-negotiation`