Skip to content
Back to skills

Risk Assessment

ASecurity

Assess a few real risks with a scenario, a control, and an owner, using the organization's own scale. Use when the user mentions risk assessment, assess this risk, risk workshop, enterprise risk item, or asks for a risk assessment. Risk and compliance skill by Yasir Jilani.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 30, 2026
ai-agentspythongoawsgitapi

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 30, 2026

npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill risk-assessment --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Risk Assessment?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Risk Assessment
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/syasj-risk-assessment/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-risk-assessment)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: risk-assessment
description: "Assess a few real risks with a scenario, a control, and an owner, using the organization's own scale. Use when the user mentions risk assessment, assess this risk, risk workshop, enterprise risk item, or asks for a risk assessment. Risk and compliance skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
  author: Yasir Jilani
  version: "1.0.0"
  domain: risk
---

<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
     Edit the 'risk-assessment' entry in source/, then run:
       python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
     See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->

# Risk Assessment

Assess a few real risks with a scenario, a control, and an owner, using the organization's own scale.

## When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user:

- risk assessment
- assess this risk
- risk workshop
- enterprise risk item

## When not to use this skill

- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.

## Professional boundary

Risk work prioritizes uncertainty. It is not a certification. Do not claim SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, or similar compliance unless the user has evidence of it.

## Operating boundaries

- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.

## Inputs to collect

- The objective at risk
- Scenarios they can describe
- Existing controls
- Their scale

## Workflow


### 1. Step 1

Write scenarios as events, not as one-word categories.
### 2. Step 2

Use their likelihood and impact scale. If none exists, propose a simple one and label it.
### 3. Step 3

Name the current control and whether they have evidence it operates.
### 4. Step 4

Rate residual risk only after the control is described.
### 5. Step 5

Recommend mitigate, accept, or transfer as a question for the owner. Insurance transfer is not confirmed unless they say a policy exists.
### 6. Step 6

Do not claim a certification because a risk was written down.

## Output

Deliver a **risk assessment**.

- Purpose of this risk assessment, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.

## Quality bar

- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.

## Example

### Scenario

Priya Shah, controller at Northline Studio in Calgary, needs a risk assessment by 30 September 2026. A workshop list says 'cyber' and 'talent' with no scenario.

### Example data

```text
From: Priya Shah, controller
Organization: Northline Studio, Calgary
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026

A workshop list says 'cyber' and 'talent' with no scenario.

The objective at risk: Control 7.2 access review is open. No score in the file
Scenarios they can describe: Control 7.2 access review. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not
Existing controls: their one-page rule dated 2 Mar 2026. No exception log since
Their scale: Vendor Redline Parts, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since
```

### Example outcome

**Risk assessment**
To: Priya Shah, controller, Northline Studio
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026

**Decision**
Rewrites those into specific events or drops them until a scenario exists.

**What the file supports**

| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The objective at risk | Control 7.2 access review is open. No score in the file | Needs confirmation |
| Scenarios they can describe | Control 7.2 access review. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not | Carried into the draft |
| Existing controls | their one-page rule dated 2 Mar 2026. No exception log since | Carried into the draft |
| Their scale | Vendor Redline Parts, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since | Needs confirmation |

**How this draft was built**

**1. Write scenarios as events, not as one-word categories**

**2. Use their likelihood and impact scale. If none exists, propose a simple one and label it**

**3. Name the current control and whether they have evidence it operates**

**4. Rate residual risk only after the control is described**

**5. Recommend mitigate, accept, or transfer as a question for the owner. Insurance transfer is not confirmed unless they say a policy exists**

**Deliberately not done**
- One-word risks.
- A certification claim.
- Ratings with no scale.

**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.

Next: Priya Shah by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.

## Anti-patterns

- One-word risks
- A certification claim
- Ratings with no scale

## Related skills

- `risk-register`
- `control-design`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…