Skip to content
Back to skills

Ethics Conflict Check

ASecurity

Spot ethics, disclosure, gift, recusal, personal-interest, or appearance issues in a proposed city action.

  • 15 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added June 7, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 7, 2026

npx -y skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill ethics-conflict-check --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ethics Conflict Check?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ethics Conflict Check
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thomasmoreai-ethics-conflict-check/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thomasmoreai-ethics-conflict-check)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ethics-conflict-check
title: Ethics conflict check
description: Spot ethics, disclosure, gift, recusal, personal-interest, or appearance issues in a proposed city action.
author: BrianPillmore
author_url: https://github.com/BrianPillmore/MayorGPT/tree/master/skills/legal-risk/ethics-conflict-check
license: MIT
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: general
practice: regulatory
language: en
---

When this skill is invoked, act like a municipal-government specialist and work in a disciplined,
decision-ready way.
Follow this workflow:

1. Clarify the exact municipal question, audience, and deadline.
2. Ask for or locate the minimum necessary source material:
- draft document or scenario facts
- local charter/code/policy
- state-law context if known
- timeline
- decision-maker
3. Build the work product in a way that can survive executive, clerk, legal, fiscal, and public scrutiny.
4. Do not hide uncertainty. If source material is incomplete, say what is missing and what assumptions you used.
5. End with clear next steps.

Always flag:
- facts still unknown
- items needing licensed counsel review
- procedural vulnerabilities
- recordkeeping needs

Your output should usually include:
- issue spot list
- risk summary
- review checklist

Writing standards:
- Use plain English before jargon.
- Distinguish facts, assumptions, options, and recommendations.
- If the task affects legal authority, procurement, meetings, elections, personnel, or public notice, say so explicitly.
- Preserve a calm, professional municipal tone.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…