Generate a sprint retrospective covering kudos, what went well, what could have gone better, blockers to speed, and action items. Use when the user asks for a sprint retro, retrospective, or sprint review.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Sprint Retro?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tomzx-sprint-retro)
---
name: sprint-retro
description: Generate a sprint retrospective covering kudos, what went well, what could have gone better, blockers to speed, and action items. Use when the user asks for a sprint retro, retrospective, or sprint review.
---
BASE_DIR=!`~/.agents/scripts/get-env NOTES_DIR`
TODAY=!`date +%Y-%m-%d`
YEAR=!`date +%Y`
MONTH=!`date +%m`
DAY=!`date +%d`
# Generate Sprint Retrospective
Produces a structured sprint retrospective by reviewing the past two weeks of daily notes, GitHub activity, and Slack activity.
## Prerequisites
- Slack MCP server connected and authenticated
- `gh` CLI authenticated
- `NOTES_DIR` environment variable set (resolved via `~/.agents/scripts/get-env NOTES_DIR`)
- `~/.agents/scripts/get-env` utility available
- At least one week of daily notes present in `{BASE_DIR}`
## Steps
### 1. Gather Data
1. Resolve the notes directory:
```
~/.agents/scripts/get-env NOTES_DIR
```
2. Read all daily note files from the past two weeks within `{BASE_DIR}` (`.github.md`, `.slack.md`, `.overall.md`, `.timeline.md`, weekly summaries).
3. Fetch recent GitHub activity (PRs opened, reviewed, merged; issues closed) for the past two weeks using `gh`.
4. Fetch recent Slack activity via the Slack MCP server for context on collaboration, blockers, and thanks.
### 2. Analyze and Categorize
Review all gathered data and categorize findings into the five retrospective sections below.
### 3. Write Retrospective
Write the output to `{BASE_DIR}/{YEAR}/{MONTH}/{DAY}.sprint-retro.md` using this template:
```markdown
# Sprint Retrospective ({TODAY})
## Kudos
People who helped, collaborated well, or did more than expected.
- **[Person]**: [What they did and why it mattered]
## Went Well
Things that worked effectively this sprint.
- [Item with brief supporting evidence]
## Could Have Gone Better
Things that did not go as smoothly as hoped.
- [Item with brief explanation of what happened]
## What Would I Have Needed to Move Faster This Sprint?
Blockers, missing context, tooling gaps, or process problems that slowed progress.
- [Item with specific suggestion if possible]
## Action Items
Concrete next steps to improve the next sprint, derived from the sections above.
- [ ] [Actionable item with owner if applicable]
```
### Guidelines for Each Section
**Kudos**: Look for thanks in Slack messages, helpful PR reviews, unblocking conversations, and collaborative problem-solving. Attribute specific contributions to specific people.
**Went Well**: Identify PRs merged smoothly, features shipped on time, effective processes, good test coverage, smooth deployments, and productive collaborations.
**Could Have Gone Better**: Identify slow PR review cycles, context-switching overhead, unclear requirements, flaky tests, repeated blockers, or communication gaps. Be constructive, not blaming.
**What Would I Have Needed to Move Faster**: Identify tooling problems, missing documentation, slow CI, waiting on dependencies, unclear ownership, or gaps in knowledge that caused delays.
**Action Items**: Derive 3-5 concrete, actionable improvements from the "Could Have Gone Better" and "Move Faster" sections. Each item should be specific enough to act on in the next sprint.
## Example Usage
**Scenario 1: Standard sprint retro**
```
/sprint-retro
```
Reviews 10 days of notes and activity. Produces a retrospective with 3 kudos, 4 went-well items, 2 improvement areas, 2 speed blockers, and 4 action items.
**Scenario 2: Quiet sprint**
Few notes and low activity. Retrospective is brief; action items focus on whether the quiet sprint was intentional or a sign of blockers.
**Scenario 3: Rough sprint**
Many blockers and slow reviews appear in the data. "Could Have Gone Better" and "Move Faster" sections are detailed; action items are prioritized by impact.
## Useful Commands Reference
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
| `~/.agents/scripts/get-env NOTES_DIR` | Resolve the notes directory path |
| `date +%Y-%m-%d` | Get today's date for output filename |
| `gh pr list --author @me --state merged --search "merged:>={TWO_WEEKS_AGO}"` | List merged PRs from the sprint |
| `gh pr list --reviewed-by @me --search "updated:>={TWO_WEEKS_AGO}"` | List PRs reviewed during the sprint |