Skip to content
Back to skills

Synthesize Feedback

ASecurity

Aggregate qualitative signal — support, sales, NPS, reviews — and combine it with the metrics read. Produces the artifact the iterate/sunset gate evaluates. Part of the PDLC Measure phase.

  • 10 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 6, 2026
business

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 6, 2026

npx -y skills add tomzx/agents --skill synthesize-feedback --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Synthesize Feedback?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Synthesize Feedback
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tomzx-synthesize-feedback/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tomzx-synthesize-feedback)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: synthesize-feedback
description: Aggregate qualitative signal — support, sales, NPS, reviews — and combine it with the metrics read. Produces the artifact the iterate/sunset gate evaluates. Part of the PDLC Measure phase.
argument-hint: "[initiative-id]"
---

# Synthesize Feedback

Combines the quantitative health report with qualitative signal from support tickets, sales conversations, NPS, reviews, and usage observations. The output (`feedback-loop.md`) is what the Measure gate reads to decide `double-down` / `iterate` / `sunset`, and it feeds back into Discover to complete the PDLC loop.

## Prerequisites

- Apply the shared PDLC conventions in `skills/pdlc/references/shared.md`.
- `health-report.md` from `review-metrics`, plus available qualitative sources.

## Steps

1. Gather qualitative signal across channels: support tickets, sales/CS notes, NPS verbatims, reviews, in-product feedback. Time-box the window to match the health report.
2. Code the feedback into themes, each with a frequency and a severity. Separate "the thing doesn't work" (defects) from "the thing isn't valuable" (problem-fit).
3. Cross-reference with the health report: does the qualitative story agree with the numbers? Where they disagree, that disagreement is itself a finding.
4. Identify the next problem with the highest leverage to solve (the candidate input to the next Discover cycle).
5. Recommend the gate verdict: `double-down` (scale what works), `iterate` (tune based on feedback), or `sunset` (the value isn't there).
6. Write `feedback-loop.md` to the initiative directory.

## Output Format

Use the template at `skills/pdlc/templates/initiatives/feedback-loop.md`.

## Outcome

If `$OUTCOME_YAML` is set:

| Verdict | When |
|---|---|
| `double-down` | Strong value confirmed; scale it |
| `iterate` | Real value, needs tuning; loop back to Discover |
| `sunset` | Value not materializing; run `sunset-product` |

## Completion Checklist

- [ ] Feedback themed with frequency and severity
- [ ] Defects separated from problem-fit issues
- [ ] Qualitative story cross-referenced with the health report
- [ ] Highest-leverage next problem identified
- [ ] Gate recommendation stated with rationale

## Next Step

Run the **Measure gate** via `make-decision` (verdict vocabulary: `double-down` / `iterate` / `sunset`).
- `iterate` → the loop closes: return to `discover-problems` with `feedback-loop.md` as input.
- `sunset` → load `sunset-product`.
- `double-down` → load `build-roadmap` to scale, or capture learnings and close.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…