Skip to content
Back to skills

Course Material Creator

ASecurity

Create custom educational materials including syllabi, lesson plans, assessments, reading lists, and learning objectives. Use when building course curricula, training programs, workshops, or educational content.

  • 100 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aigodatabaseperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill course-material-creator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Course Material Creator?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Course Material Creator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/travisjneuman-course-material-creator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/travisjneuman-course-material-creator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: course-material-creator
description: Create custom educational materials including syllabi, lesson plans, assessments, reading lists, and learning objectives. Use when building course curricula, training programs, workshops, or educational content.
---

# Course Material Creator

Frameworks for designing structured educational experiences from syllabus creation through assessment design, supporting formal courses, corporate training, and self-directed learning programs.

## Syllabus Design

### Syllabus Template

```
COURSE SYLLABUS

COURSE TITLE: ______________________________
INSTRUCTOR: ________________________________
TERM/DATES: ________________________________
MEETING TIME: ______________________________
LOCATION: __________________________________

COURSE DESCRIPTION (2-3 sentences):
[What the course covers and why it matters]

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
By the end of this course, students will be able to:
  1. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  2. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  3. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  4. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  5. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]

PREREQUISITES:
  - [Required prior knowledge or courses]
  - [Required tools or materials]

REQUIRED MATERIALS:
  - [Textbook, software, supplies]

GRADING / ASSESSMENT:
  Component              | Weight | Due Dates
  Participation          | ___%   | Ongoing
  Assignments (N)        | ___%   | Weekly/Biweekly
  Midterm project/exam   | ___%   | Week __
  Final project/exam     | ___%   | Week __

GRADING SCALE:
  A: 93-100  A-: 90-92  B+: 87-89  B: 83-86  B-: 80-82
  C+: 77-79  C: 73-76   C-: 70-72  D: 60-69  F: <60

COURSE SCHEDULE:
  Week 1:  [Topic] — Reading: [Ch. X] — Due: [Assignment]
  Week 2:  [Topic] — Reading: [Ch. X] — Due: [Assignment]
  ...
  Week N:  [Topic] — Final project due

POLICIES:
  Late work: [Policy]
  Attendance: [Policy]
  Academic integrity: [Policy]
  Accommodations: [Statement]
```

### Learning Objective Verbs (Bloom's Taxonomy)

| Level | Verbs | Example Objective |
|-------|-------|-------------------|
| **Remember** | Define, list, recall, identify, name, recognize | "List the five phases of project management" |
| **Understand** | Explain, describe, summarize, interpret, classify | "Explain the relationship between supply and demand" |
| **Apply** | Use, implement, solve, demonstrate, calculate | "Apply regression analysis to a real-world dataset" |
| **Analyze** | Compare, contrast, examine, differentiate, organize | "Analyze competing business strategies and identify trade-offs" |
| **Evaluate** | Assess, critique, justify, recommend, judge | "Evaluate the effectiveness of three marketing campaigns" |
| **Create** | Design, construct, develop, formulate, produce | "Design a database schema for a multi-tenant application" |

## Lesson Plan Design

### Single Lesson Template

```
LESSON PLAN

Topic: _________________________________
Duration: _______ minutes
Week/Session: __________________________
Prerequisites: _________________________

LEARNING OBJECTIVES (this lesson):
  Students will be able to:
  1. [Objective]
  2. [Objective]

MATERIALS NEEDED:
  - [Slides, handouts, tools, datasets]

LESSON STRUCTURE:

  TIME    | ACTIVITY          | METHOD          | NOTES
  --------|-------------------|-----------------|----------
  0-5     | Opening hook      | Story/question  | Engage interest
  5-15    | Review prior      | Q&A / quiz      | Connect to today
  15-35   | New content       | Lecture + demo   | Core concepts
  35-50   | Guided practice   | Pair exercise    | Apply with support
  50-65   | Independent work  | Solo exercise    | Apply independently
  65-75   | Debrief + Q&A     | Discussion       | Clarify and extend
  75-80   | Preview next      | Summary          | Connect forward

DIFFERENTIATION:
  Struggling learners: [Scaffolding or alternative]
  Advanced learners: [Extension activity]

ASSESSMENT:
  Formative: [How you'll check understanding during class]
  Summative: [How this connects to graded assessment]

REFLECTION (post-lesson):
  - What worked well?
  - What would I change?
  - What do students need more practice on?
```

### Engagement Techniques

| Technique | Duration | Best For | Description |
|-----------|----------|----------|-------------|
| **Think-Pair-Share** | 5-10 min | Concept processing | Think alone, discuss with partner, share with class |
| **Jigsaw** | 20-30 min | Complex topics | Groups each learn one piece, then teach each other |
| **Case Study** | 30-60 min | Application | Analyze real-world scenario, propose solutions |
| **Gallery Walk** | 15-20 min | Peer review | Post work around room, students circulate and comment |
| **Muddiest Point** | 3-5 min | Checking understanding | Students write what confused them most |
| **Minute Paper** | 3-5 min | Reflection | "What was the most important thing you learned today?" |
| **Fishbowl** | 15-20 min | Discussion skills | Inner circle discusses, outer circle observes |
| **Role Play** | 15-30 min | Soft skills | Act out scenarios (negotiation, feedback, sales) |

## Assessment Design

### Assessment Types and When to Use

| Assessment Type | Purpose | Measures | Best For |
|----------------|---------|----------|----------|
| **Multiple choice** | Knowledge recall | Recognition, basic understanding | Large classes, quick grading |
| **Short answer** | Comprehension | Explanation, application | Mid-depth understanding |
| **Essay** | Analysis/synthesis | Critical thinking, argumentation | Deep understanding |
| **Project** | Application/creation | Practical skills, creativity | Real-world competency |
| **Presentation** | Communication | Public speaking, synthesis | Explaining complex topics |
| **Portfolio** | Growth over time | Cumulative progress, reflection | Long-term skill development |
| **Peer review** | Evaluation skills | Critical analysis, feedback | Collaborative learning |
| **Practical/lab** | Hands-on skills | Technical execution | Applied/technical courses |

### Rubric Design Template

```
RUBRIC: [Assignment Name]

Criteria        | Excellent (4)      | Good (3)          | Adequate (2)      | Needs Work (1)
----------------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------
[Criterion 1]   | [Description of    | [Description of    | [Description of    | [Description of
                | excellent work]    | good work]         | adequate work]     | poor work]
                |                    |                    |                    |
[Criterion 2]   | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]
                |                    |                    |                    |
[Criterion 3]   | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]
                |                    |                    |                    |
[Criterion 4]   | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]

SCORING:
  Total points: ___ / [Max]
  Weight: ___% of final grade
```

## Reading List Curation

### Reading Selection Framework

```
READING LIST CURATION:

FOR EACH READING, EVALUATE:
  Relevance:     Does it directly support learning objectives?
  Accessibility: Is the reading level appropriate?
  Recency:       Is the information current? (or intentionally historical?)
  Diversity:     Does the list include varied perspectives?
  Length:         Is the total reading load reasonable?

READING LOAD GUIDELINES:
  Undergraduate:  30-50 pages/week
  Graduate:       50-100 pages/week
  Professional:   20-40 pages/week (busy professionals)
  Self-directed:  Learner's pace (provide suggested schedule)

CATEGORIZATION:
  Required:    Must read before class/session
  Recommended: Deepens understanding of required material
  Reference:   Available for future use/specific needs
  Optional:    For highly interested learners
```

### Annotated Reading List Template

```
READING LIST: [Course Name]

WEEK 1: [Topic]
  REQUIRED:
  - [Author]. "[Title]." [Source], [Year]. [Pages/sections].
    Why: [1 sentence on what this reading contributes]

  RECOMMENDED:
  - [Author]. "[Title]." [Source], [Year].
    Why: [1 sentence on supplementary value]

WEEK 2: [Topic]
  ...
```

## Curriculum Mapping

### Course-Level Alignment

```
CURRICULUM MAP:

Program Objective    | Course(s)           | Assessment           | Bloom's Level
---------------------|---------------------|----------------------|-------------
[Program obj 1]      | [Course A, Week 3]  | [Assignment type]    | Apply
                     | [Course B, Week 7]  | [Project component]  | Create
[Program obj 2]      | [Course A, Week 5]  | [Exam question]      | Analyze
                     | [Course C, Week 2]  | [Case study]         | Evaluate
```

### Backward Design Process

```
BACKWARD DESIGN (Understanding by Design):

STAGE 1: DESIRED RESULTS
  What should students know and be able to do?
  - Enduring understandings (big ideas that last)
  - Essential questions (driving inquiry)
  - Learning objectives (specific, measurable)

STAGE 2: ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE
  How will you know students have learned?
  - Performance tasks (authentic assessment)
  - Other evidence (quizzes, observations, self-assessment)
  - Criteria for success (rubrics, checklists)

STAGE 3: LEARNING PLAN
  What experiences will enable learning?
  - Instructional activities (lessons, labs, discussions)
  - Sequence and pacing (build from simple to complex)
  - Resources and materials (readings, tools, examples)
  - Differentiation (support and extension)
```

## Workshop and Training Design

### Workshop Template

```
WORKSHOP DESIGN: [Title]
Duration: [X hours/days]
Audience: [Who and their level]
Max Participants: [N]

PRE-WORK (if any):
  - [Reading, video, or self-assessment]

AGENDA:
  TIME        ACTIVITY                    FORMAT
  9:00-9:15   Welcome and introductions   Icebreaker
  9:15-9:30   Learning objectives + agenda Overview
  9:30-10:30  Module 1: [Topic]           Lecture + exercise
  10:30-10:45 Break
  10:45-12:00 Module 2: [Topic]           Case study + discussion
  12:00-1:00  Lunch
  1:00-2:30   Module 3: [Topic]           Hands-on workshop
  2:30-2:45   Break
  2:45-3:45   Application exercise        Group project
  3:45-4:15   Presentations               Group share-outs
  4:15-4:30   Wrap-up and evaluation      Reflection + survey

MATERIALS CHECKLIST:
  [ ] Slide deck
  [ ] Handouts/workbooks
  [ ] Exercise materials
  [ ] Name tags
  [ ] Evaluation forms
  [ ] Supplies (markers, sticky notes, etc.)

POST-WORKSHOP:
  - Send follow-up email with resources
  - Share slide deck and recordings
  - Collect and review evaluations
  - Schedule follow-up session (if applicable)
```

## See Also

- [Learning Gap Analyzer](../learning-gap-analyzer/SKILL.md)
- [Research Presenter](../research-presenter/SKILL.md)
- [Literature Review Planner](../literature-review-planner/SKILL.md)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…