Skip to content
Back to skills

Using Superpowers

ASecurity

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

  • 484 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 12, 2026
businessgotesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 12, 2026

npx -y skills add Trevoke/org-gtd.el --skill using-superpowers --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Using Superpowers?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Using Superpowers
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/trevoke-using-superpowers/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/trevoke-using-superpowers)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: using-superpowers
description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
---

<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST read the skill.

IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU MUST USE IT.

This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>

# Using Skills

## The Rule

**Check for skills BEFORE ANY RESPONSE.** This includes clarifying questions. Even 1% chance means invoke the Skill tool first.

## Development Workflow Skills

These skills form a pipeline. Each phase produces a dated artifact and references the next step:

| Skill | When to Use |
|-------|-------------|
| `/define` | New feature request, bug report, or requirement to break down |
| `/architect` | Requirements exist, need technical design |
| `/implement` | Design exists, ready to build |
| `/qa` | Implementation complete, need adversarial testing |
| `/refactor` | Code quality pass after implementation |

You don't always need all phases. Start at whichever phase makes sense.

## Red Flags

These thoughts mean STOP — you're rationalizing:

| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |

## Skill Priority

When multiple skills could apply:

1. **Process skills first** (define, architect) — determine HOW to approach
2. **Implementation skills second** (implement, qa, refactor) — guide execution

## Skill Types

**Rigid** (TDD, qa): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.

**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.

The skill itself tells you which.

## User Instructions

Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…