Skip to content
Back to skills

Harvest Adaptive

ASecurity

Adaptive content summarization - auto-detect content type and produce relevant summary

  • 530 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 29, 2026
ai-agentsgobashgitapidocumentation

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 29, 2026

npx -y skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill harvest-adaptive --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Harvest Adaptive?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Harvest Adaptive
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vibeeval-harvest-adaptive/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vibeeval-harvest-adaptive)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: harvest-adaptive
description: Adaptive content summarization - auto-detect content type and produce relevant summary
allowed-tools: [Bash, Read, Write, WebFetch, WebSearch]
keywords: [digest, summary, evaluate, library, tool, article, adaptive, overview]
---

# Harvest Adaptive (Digest)

Automatically detect content type and produce the most useful summary. A blog post gets key takeaways. A library gets feature evaluation. Documentation gets structure overview. API reference gets endpoint catalog.

## Usage

```
/digest <url>
```

## Examples

```bash
# Evaluate a library
/digest https://github.com/owner/cool-library

# Summarize an article
/digest https://blog.example.com/microservices-patterns

# Overview documentation
/digest https://docs.example.com
```

## Content Type Detection

| Type | Signals | Output Style |
|------|---------|-------------|
| Library/Tool | GitHub repo, npm page, PyPI | Feature matrix, ecosystem health, recommendation |
| Blog/Article | Single long-form content | Key takeaways, relevance assessment |
| Documentation | Multi-page, navigation structure | Structure map, coverage assessment, quality |
| API Reference | Endpoints, methods, params | Endpoint catalog, auth info, SDK availability |
| Comparison | Tables, vs, alternatives | Feature matrix, winner per category |
| Tutorial | Step-by-step, code blocks | Prerequisites, steps summary, outcome |

## Output Templates

### Library Evaluation
```markdown
# Library: [name]
> Source: [URL] | Stars: [X] | Last commit: [date]

## What It Does
[1-2 sentence description]

## Key Features
- Feature 1
- Feature 2

## Ecosystem Health
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| GitHub Stars | X |
| Weekly Downloads | X |
| Last Release | date |
| Open Issues | X |
| Contributors | X |

## API Surface
[Key classes/functions/exports]

## Verdict
[Use when... Don't use when... Alternatives: ...]
```

### Article Summary
```markdown
# Summary: [title]
> Source: [URL] | Author: [name] | Date: [date]

## Key Takeaways
1. [Point 1]
2. [Point 2]
3. [Point 3]

## Relevance
[How this applies to current project/context]

## Action Items
- [What to do based on this]
```

## Rules

- Auto-detect, don't ask user for content type
- Keep summaries under 500 words
- Always include source URL and date
- For libraries: check last commit date, flag if > 6 months
- For articles: check publication date, flag if > 1 year
- Confidence rating on every assessment

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…