Skip to content
Back to skills

Pentest Methodology

ASecurity

Ethical security testing methodology - 5-phase pipeline, OWASP checklist, proof levels, structured findings

  • 530 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 29, 2026
ai-agentsgosqlawstestingcode-reviewapici/cdsecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 29, 2026

npx -y skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill pentest-methodology --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pentest Methodology?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pentest Methodology
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vibeeval-pentest-methodology/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vibeeval-pentest-methodology)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pentest-methodology
description: Ethical security testing methodology - 5-phase pipeline, OWASP checklist, proof levels, structured findings
---

# Pentest Methodology

Etik guvenlik testi metodolojisi. Shannon framework'unden adapte.

**ONEMLI**: Bu skill sadece YETKILI guvenlik testleri icin kullanilir. Bug bounty, pentest anlasmasi, veya kendi sisteminiz olmali.

## 5-Faz Pipeline

```
Phase 1: Recon ──▶ Phase 2: Vuln Analysis ──▶ Phase 3: Exploitation
                                                        │
Phase 5: Report ◀── Phase 4: Verification ◀────────────┘
```

### Phase 1: Reconnaissance (Kesfetme)

| Adim | Arac/Yontem | Cikti |
|------|-------------|-------|
| Subdomain enum | DNS brute, certificate transparency | Subdomain listesi |
| Port scan | nmap, masscan | Acik portlar |
| Tech stack | Wappalyzer, HTTP headers | Teknoloji listesi |
| Directory enum | ffuf, gobuster | Endpoint listesi |
| API discovery | Swagger/OpenAPI, sitemap | API endpoint'leri |
| Source review | JS dosyalari, comments | Hardcoded info |

### Phase 2: Vulnerability Analysis

OWASP Top 10 kontrol matrisi:

| # | Vuln | Test Yontemi |
|---|------|-------------|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | IDOR, privilege escalation, path traversal |
| A02 | Cryptographic Failures | SSL config, weak ciphers, plaintext storage |
| A03 | Injection | SQLi, XSS, command injection, template injection |
| A04 | Insecure Design | Business logic flaws, race conditions |
| A05 | Security Misconfiguration | Default creds, verbose errors, CORS |
| A06 | Vulnerable Components | CVE scan, outdated dependencies |
| A07 | Auth Failures | Brute force, session fixation, JWT attacks |
| A08 | Data Integrity | Deserialization, CI/CD pipeline attacks |
| A09 | Logging Failures | Log injection, insufficient audit trail |
| A10 | SSRF | Internal service access, cloud metadata |

### Phase 3: Exploitation (Dogrulama)

Her bulgu icin:
1. **Reproduce**: Tekrarlanabilir adimlar yaz
2. **Proof**: Etkiyi goster (ekran goruntusu, response)
3. **Impact**: Gercek etki ne? (Data leak, RCE, account takeover)
4. **Scope**: Etki alani ne kadar genis?

### Phase 4: Verification

Bulgunun gercek oldugunu dogrula:
- False positive degil mi? Farkli kosullarda tekrarla
- Scope dogru mu? Sadece bir endpoint mi, yoksa sistemik mi?
- Severity dogru mu? Etkiyi abartma, kucumseme

### Phase 5: Report

Yapilandirilmis bulgu formati (asagida)

## Proof Levels

| Level | Tanim | Ornek |
|-------|-------|-------|
| L1 - Theoretical | Potansiyel risk, exploit edilmemis | "Bu endpoint input validate etmiyor" |
| L2 - Demonstrated | Bypass/leak gosterildi | "SQL injection ile hata mesaji leak etti" |
| L3 - Exploited | Tam exploit, veri erisimi | "Admin panel'e yetkisiz erisim saglandi" |
| L4 - Chained | Birden fazla vuln zincirlendi | "XSS + CSRF = Account takeover" |

## Structured Finding Format

```markdown
## [SEVERITY] Finding Title

**ID**: FINDING-001
**Severity**: Critical / High / Medium / Low / Informational
**Proof Level**: L1 / L2 / L3 / L4
**CVSS**: X.X (hesapla: cvss.org)
**CWE**: CWE-XXX

### Description
Ne bulundu, tek paragraf.

### Impact
Exploit edilirse ne olur?

### Steps to Reproduce
1. [Adim 1]
2. [Adim 2]
3. [Adim 3]

### Proof
[Screenshot, HTTP request/response, veya kod]

### Remediation
Nasil duzeltilir?

### References
- [OWASP link]
- [CWE link]
```

## Source-to-Sink Taint Tracing

Kullanici input'unun tehlikeli bir fonksiyona ulasip ulasamadigini kontrol et:

```
Source (Input)        ──▶  Transform/Sanitize?  ──▶  Sink (Tehlikeli fonksiyon)
req.body.username     ──▶  Validation var mi?    ──▶  db.query(...)
req.query.redirect    ──▶  URL whitelist var mi?  ──▶  res.redirect(...)
req.headers.host      ──▶  Sanitize var mi?      ──▶  fetch(...)
```

**Source'lar**: req.body, req.query, req.params, req.headers, cookies, file uploads
**Sink'ler**: SQL query, eval(), exec(), redirect(), innerHTML, dangerouslySetInnerHTML

## Agent Entegrasyonu

- **security-analyst**: Bu pipeline'i kullanarak tam guvenlik auditi yapar
- **security-reviewer**: Code review sirasinda vuln pattern'lerini kontrol eder
- **code-reviewer**: Security-relevant code degisikliklerinde flag kaldirir

## Kurallar

- Yetki olmadan test YAPMA
- Rate limiting'e uy, sistemi cokertme
- Buldugun seyi raporla, exploit etme (beyond PoC)
- Hassas verileri rapordan cikar (maskeleme)
- Remediation onerisi ZORUNLU

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…