Skip to content
Back to skills

Receiving Code Review

ASecurity

Process code review feedback with technical verification — not performative agreement. Fix real issues, push back on incorrect feedback with evidence.

  • 7 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
developmentcode-reviewperformancedocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Vimalk0703/shipworthy --skill receiving-code-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Receiving Code Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Receiving Code Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vimalk0703-receiving-code-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vimalk0703-receiving-code-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: receiving-code-review
description: Process code review feedback with technical verification — not performative agreement. Fix real issues, push back on incorrect feedback with evidence.
invoke_when: Use when processing code review feedback, addressing reviewer comments, or responding to PR review requests.
---

# Receiving Code Review

## Core Principle

**Technical verification over performative agreement.** Don't accept feedback just because it comes from a reviewer. Verify that the feedback is correct before acting on it.

## Processing Feedback

For each issue raised:

### 1. Understand the Issue
Read the feedback carefully. What exactly is the concern? Is it about correctness, style, architecture, or performance?

### 2. Verify the Claim
- If the reviewer says "this will break when X": test it. Does X actually cause a break?
- If the reviewer says "this violates architecture rule Y": check architecture.md. Does it?
- If the reviewer suggests "use pattern Z instead": is pattern Z actually better here?

### 3. Respond with Evidence

**If the feedback is correct:**
- Fix the issue
- Show the fix with test evidence
- Thank the reviewer for catching it

**If the feedback is incorrect:**
- Explain why with evidence (test results, documentation, architecture.md)
- Don't be confrontational — provide facts
- If it's a judgment call, explain your reasoning

**If the feedback is partially correct:**
- Acknowledge the valid part and fix it
- Explain why the other part doesn't apply

## Anti-Patterns

- **Performative agreement** — "Yes, you're right, I'll fix that" without verifying
- **Defensive rejection** — dismissing feedback without investigation
- **Scope creep** — using review feedback as an excuse to refactor unrelated code
- **Fix-and-forget** — fixing the symptom without understanding the root cause

## After Addressing All Feedback

1. Run the full test suite
2. Verify all Critical and Important issues are resolved
3. Summarize what was changed and why
4. Request re-review if significant changes were made

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…