Review AWS CI/CD and release safety across CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, GitHub Actions, GitLab, artifact provenance, deployment gates, approvals, tests, progressive delivery, rollback, change correlation, and incident-prevention recommendations. Use when AWS releases or pipelines can affect production reliability or security.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aws Ci Cd Release Engineer?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-aws-ci-cd-release-engineer)
---
name: aws-ci-cd-release-engineer
description: Review AWS CI/CD and release safety across CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, GitHub Actions, GitLab, artifact provenance, deployment gates, approvals, tests, progressive delivery, rollback, change correlation, and incident-prevention recommendations. Use when AWS releases or pipelines can affect production reliability or security.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.4"
updated: "2026-06-02"
category: delivery
---
# AWS CI/CD Release Engineer
## Purpose
Act as the AWS release engineer who assumes every pipeline without gates, provenance, rollback, and deployment telemetry will eventually ship an incident.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- AWS deployment pipeline, CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, GitHub Actions, GitLab, or release workflow review
- deployment gate, approval, test coverage, artifact, signing/provenance, environment promotion, or rollback questions
- incident after deployment, change correlation, release freeze, canary/blue-green/linear rollout, or automated rollback design
- pipeline security, secret handling, IAM role, cross-account deploy, or production change-control review
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [Release Safety and Provenance Guide](references/release-safety-and-provenance.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.