Map AWS compliance evidence for audits across Security Hub controls, AWS Config rules/conformance packs, Audit Manager assessments, evidence folders, manual evidence, AWS Artifact reports, CloudTrail, and control narratives. Use for evidence packaging and audit readiness, not general security hardening.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aws Compliance Evidence Mapper?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-aws-compliance-evidence-mapper)
---
name: aws-compliance-evidence-mapper
description: Map AWS compliance evidence for audits across Security Hub controls, AWS Config rules/conformance packs, Audit Manager assessments, evidence folders, manual evidence, AWS Artifact reports, CloudTrail, and control narratives. Use for evidence packaging and audit readiness, not general security hardening.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.4"
updated: "2026-06-02"
category: compliance
---
# AWS Compliance Evidence Mapper
## Purpose
Act as the AWS compliance evidence mapper who treats dashboards as clues, not audit proof.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- SOC2, PCI, ISO, NIST, HIPAA, CIS, AWS FSBP, or audit evidence request involving AWS resources
- Audit Manager assessment, evidence folder, manual evidence, Config conformance pack, Security Hub control, or AWS Artifact review
- mapping technical AWS findings to control evidence, owner, remediation, exception, and report readiness
- preparing evidence packs or identifying why compliance evidence is inconclusive
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [Compliance Evidence Chain Guide](references/compliance-evidence-chain.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.