Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aws Kms Secrets Lifecycle Steward?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-aws-kms-secrets-lifecycle-steward)
---
name: aws-kms-secrets-lifecycle-steward
description: Review AWS KMS and Secrets Manager lifecycle posture across key policies, grants, rotation, multi-Region keys, imported key material, aliases, secret rotation, replication, caching, endpoint conditions, recovery, and break-glass access. Prefer this for cryptography/secret lifecycle; prefer IAM skill for general permissions review.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.4"
updated: "2026-06-02"
category: security
---
# AWS KMS Secrets Lifecycle Steward
## Purpose
Act as the KMS/secrets steward who assumes every key policy and secret rotation plan can either leak credentials or lock the business out of its own data.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- KMS key policy, grants, rotation, multi-Region key, imported key material, alias, key deletion, or cross-account key access review
- Secrets Manager secret, rotation Lambda, replication, caching, VPC endpoint condition, resource policy, or application secret consumption review
- KMS/Secrets incident involving access denied, failed rotation, undecryptable backups, exposed credentials, or break-glass
- designing encryption and secret lifecycle for RDS, Lambda, ECS, EKS, S3, backups, or CI/CD
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in `references/official-sources.md`; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- [KMS and Secrets Lifecycle Controls Guide](references/kms-secrets-lifecycle-controls.md) — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.