Skip to content
Back to skills

Azure Rbac Review

ASecurity

Use this skill for Azure RBAC, Entra-backed access, role assignment, custom role, scope, subscription, management group, or least-privilege review tasks. Trigger when the user asks whether Azure access is too broad or how to grant access safely.

  • 23 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 4, 2026
ai-agentsgoazuregitsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 6 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 4, 2026

npx -y skills add VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill azure-rbac-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Azure Rbac Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Azure Rbac Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vincentchuwaichow-azure-rbac-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-azure-rbac-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: azure-rbac-review
description: Use this skill for Azure RBAC, Entra-backed access, role assignment, custom role, scope, subscription, management group, or least-privilege review tasks. Trigger when the user asks whether Azure access is too broad or how to grant access safely.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
  author: github: VincentChuWaiChow
  version: 0.1.2
  updated: "2026-06-05"
  category: security
---

# Azure RBAC Review

## Purpose

Review Azure access decisions against least privilege, scope minimization, and operational safety.

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer Microsoft Learn documentation through the user's configured documentation MCP, then sampled read-only Azure evidence when available, then sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [Azure RBAC Review Operations](references/rbac-review-operations.md) — use for current service behavior, common failure modes, hard design rules, verification targets, and push-back conditions.
- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use for evidence labels, risk gates, mutation boundaries, approval rules, credential boundaries, and current-state caveats.
- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing documentation-based evidence, sampled read-only evidence, or sanitized user evidence.
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB
  • references/mcp-and-evidence.md1.2 KB
  • references/official-sources.md1.4 KB
  • references/rbac-review-operations.md4.8 KB
  • references/safety-checklist.md2.1 KB
  • references/workflow-and-output.md1.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…