Skip to content
Back to skills

Research Methodology

ASecurity

Best practices for systematic research, source evaluation, and evidence gathering

  • 1,076 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added September 5, 2026
ai-agentsgodocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 5, 2026

npx -y skills add vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents --skill research-methodology --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Research Methodology?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Research Methodology
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vstorm-co-research-methodology/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vstorm-co-research-methodology)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: research-methodology
description: Best practices for systematic research, source evaluation, and evidence gathering
auto_load: false
---

# Research Methodology Guide

## Search Strategy

### Phase 1: Broad Discovery
- Start with general queries to understand the landscape
- Use different phrasings for the same concept
- Note key terminology, authors, and organizations

### Phase 2: Focused Deep-Dive
- Search for specific claims, statistics, or technical details
- Target authoritative sources identified in Phase 1
- Use exact phrases in quotes for precision

### Phase 3: Verification
- Cross-reference key claims across multiple sources
- Search for counter-arguments or contradictions
- Check publication dates for recency

## Source Evaluation

### Reliability Hierarchy
1. **Academic papers** (peer-reviewed journals, arXiv preprints)
2. **Official documentation** (government, organization, project docs)
3. **Reputable news** (established outlets with editorial standards)
4. **Expert blog posts** (known authors with credentials)
5. **Community forums** (Stack Overflow, Reddit — use cautiously)

### Evaluation Checklist
- **Authority**: Who wrote it? What are their credentials?
- **Currency**: When was it published? Is it still relevant?
- **Coverage**: Does it address the topic comprehensively?
- **Accuracy**: Can claims be verified elsewhere?
- **Objectivity**: Is there obvious bias or commercial interest?

## Note-Taking Best Practices

### Structure Each Note File
```markdown
# [Sub-topic Title]

## Key Findings
- Finding 1 [SOURCE: url, accessed YYYY-MM-DD] [HIGH confidence]
- Finding 2 [SOURCE: url, accessed YYYY-MM-DD] [MEDIUM confidence]

## Contradictions
- Source A says X, but Source B says Y

## Gaps
- Could not find reliable data on Z
```

### Confidence Levels
- **[HIGH]**: Multiple authoritative sources agree
- **[MEDIUM]**: Single authoritative source, or multiple less-reliable sources agree
- **[LOW]**: Single non-authoritative source, or conflicting information

## Common Pitfalls
- Don't rely on a single source for important claims
- Check if "recent" articles cite outdated data
- Be wary of sources that don't cite their own sources
- Distinguish between correlation and causation
- Note when sample sizes are small or studies are preliminary

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…