Legend: ▲ answer · ⚠ structural violation · ⇄ unexplained order · ⊗ overlap · ⊕ gap ```text ⚠ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant profit improvements. [▲ The opening states a topic and purpose, not an answer to the reader’s decision question.] It is organized in six sections: ⚠ Background ⚠ Principles of the project-team approach ⚠ Definition of project work ⚠ Organization of the program ⚠ Distinctive benefits and results [⊗ “benefits” and “results” ma...
$npx -y skills add welltraum/minto --skill raw --agent claude-code
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Raw?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/welltraum-raw-affecf8f)
Legend: ▲ answer · ⚠ structural violation · ⇄ unexplained order · ⊗ overlap · ⊕ gap
```text
⚠ This memorandum describes how project teams identify and deliver significant
profit improvements. [▲ The opening states a topic and purpose, not an answer to
the reader’s decision question.] It is organized in six sections:
⚠ Background
⚠ Principles of the project-team approach
⚠ Definition of project work
⚠ Organization of the program
⚠ Distinctive benefits and results [⊗ “benefits” and “results” may overlap]
⚠ Conditions required for success
⇄ [The sequence of these headings has no stated ordering principle.]
```
| Location | Violation | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Opening sentence | No answer in the visible opening; it only announces the topic. | State the conclusion that answers the reader’s question before listing support. |
| Six headings | Mixed kinds: context, principles, definition, organizational design, outcomes, and conditions. | Group headings by one kind that answers the reader’s question. |
| “Distinctive benefits and results” | Potential overlap within one heading. | Distinguish the two terms or use one defined category. |
| Heading sequence | No visible time, structure, ranking, deduction, or induction order. | Select and signal an order appropriate to the argument. |
| Overall setout | Flat contents list does not show how the sections support one controlling idea. | Make the hierarchy and parent-child logic visible. |
| Completeness | ⊕ The visible setout cannot demonstrate a complete explanation of how improvements are identified and delivered; the body is unavailable. | Verify coverage against the intended reader question once the body is available. |
Score: **1/10 — not structured yet**
| Axis | Score |
|---|---:|
| Top | 0 |
| Same-kind groups | 0 |
| Order | 0 |
| MECE | 0 |
| Display | 1 |
Top three fixes:
1. Replace the topic-led opening with a single answer to the reader’s question.
2. Rebuild the six headings into 3–4 same-kind supporting groups.
3. Order those groups by an explicit logical principle and display their hierarchy.
