Trains a transformer with MarginRankingLoss on text pairs (more/less toxic), learning to rank rather than classify when only pairwise preference labels are available.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pairwise Margin Ranking Loss?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wenmin-wu-pairwise-margin-ranking-loss)
---
name: nlp-pairwise-margin-ranking-loss
description: >
Trains a transformer with MarginRankingLoss on text pairs (more/less toxic), learning to rank rather than classify when only pairwise preference labels are available.
---
# Pairwise Margin Ranking Loss
## Overview
When labels are pairwise preferences ("text A is more toxic than text B") rather than absolute scores, MarginRankingLoss trains a model to produce scalar scores where the preferred item scores higher by at least a margin. Each text is encoded independently through a shared transformer, producing two scalars per pair. The loss penalizes pairs where the "more toxic" score isn't at least `margin` above the "less toxic" score. This is the standard approach for learning-to-rank with neural encoders.
## Quick Start
```python
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from transformers import AutoModel, AutoTokenizer
class RankingModel(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, model_name):
super().__init__()
self.encoder = AutoModel.from_pretrained(model_name)
self.drop = nn.Dropout(0.2)
self.fc = nn.Linear(self.encoder.config.hidden_size, 1)
def forward(self, ids, mask):
out = self.encoder(input_ids=ids, attention_mask=mask)
return self.fc(self.drop(out.pooler_output))
# Training
criterion = nn.MarginRankingLoss(margin=0.5)
target = torch.ones(batch_size) # more_toxic should score higher
score_more = model(more_toxic_ids, more_toxic_mask)
score_less = model(less_toxic_ids, less_toxic_mask)
loss = criterion(score_more.squeeze(), score_less.squeeze(), target)
```
## Workflow
1. Tokenize both texts in each pair independently
2. Forward each through the shared encoder to get scalar scores
3. Compute MarginRankingLoss(score_more, score_less, target=1)
4. At inference, rank all texts by their scalar score
## Key Decisions
- **Margin**: 0.3-1.0; larger margin forces stronger separation but may underfit
- **Shared encoder**: Both items use the same weights — this is a siamese architecture
- **Pooling**: CLS token or mean pooling both work; CLS is simpler for scalar output
- **vs classification**: Ranking loss doesn't need absolute labels, only relative ordering
## References
- [Pytorch + W&B Jigsaw Starter](https://www.kaggle.com/code/debarshichanda/pytorch-w-b-jigsaw-starter)