Skip to content
Back to skills

Refactoring

ASecurity

Improve code structure while pinning and proving unchanged externally observable behavior.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 1, 2026
ai-agentsrefactoringapi

Works with

  • terminal
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 6, 2026

npx -y skills add williamwue/oh-my-stack --skill refactoring --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Refactoring?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Refactoring
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/williamwue-refactoring-10270973/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/williamwue-refactoring-10270973)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: refactoring
description: "Improve code structure while pinning and proving unchanged externally observable behavior."
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Refactoring

## OMP model routing

At the start of this workflow, run `../../scripts/model-resolution.mjs`
with `--runtime omp --cwd` set to the current workspace. Read the returned
manifest: nearest project first, then the user's `~/.omp/agent/` default.
For each configured route, select its named agent through OMP's native
task-agent selector and verify that its source matches the chosen scope;
for a canonical role, use the manifest role's `agent` name (user
defaults use namespaced `ohmystack-role-*` agents).
Preserve panel entry order and count. If no mapping is present, retain the
workflow's normal runtime model. Verify resolved worker model and thinking
level from OMP session/job metadata, not from the role file alone.
When `task` returns a background job id, retain it until terminal status.
On OMP hosts exposing `proc://` (observed in 18.3.0), use `read proc://<id>`
for non-consuming status, `wait` to drain, and `write proc://<id>/kill`
to cancel an owned job with the required approval. Confirm cancellation
before replacing a worker and reject results from older generations.
Do not assume the deprecated `hub` tool exists. If safe cancellation
is unavailable, wait or report the unit incomplete; never silently
treat an unconfirmed worker as cancelled.
For this workflow's implementers use `code.feature-refactoring`.

## Child session handoff

Read [the handoff contract](../poteto-mode/references/subagent-handoff.md).
New tasks, repair rounds, retries, and queue items use fresh child sessions
with the original brief, every later directive, prior findings and responses,
and unresolved objections. Reuse only for required costly live state, and
only when the host allows it. Stop and fence active writers before replacement.
A host-owned orchestrator's model catalog, workspace binding, child tools,
and review-round rules take precedence over the native binding above.
Keep its task handles and attribution receipts. Do not use a backing child
conversation as a new delegated review, or claim native-record verification
for a host-owned child. Report attribution evidence gaps explicitly.

The root owns the behavior contract. Structure may change; behavior may not.

1. Use `how` to trace the affected behavior and callers. Pin the current
   contract with a characterization test, snapshot, equivalence harness, or
   recorded real-surface result before structural edits. Type checking alone is
   not a behavior pin.
2. Name the current reader-load problem and the target shape. The target should
   remove branches, invalid states, duplication, or needless layers rather than
   add speculative abstraction.
3. Remove dead code and redundant indirection before introducing the target
   structure. For an API reshape, migrate all in-scope callers and delete the
   obsolete path in the same verified wave.
4. Assign one bounded writer or implement at the root. A delegated writer uses
   the active `code.feature-refactoring` route when configured. Use isolation when
   available; otherwise serialize writes. Keep each step behavior-preserving and
   rerun the pin after each independently meaningful slice.
5. The root reviews the diff and runs an equivalence check on the real artifact.
   If behavior changes, split it into a separately requested feature or bug fix.
6. Keep the refactor only if the final code measurably lowers reader load.
7. Do not publish or open a pull request unless the user explicitly requested it.

Return the pinned contract, structural before and after, exact equivalence
proof, reader-load reduction, reverted experiments, and verification boundary.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…