This skill should be used before answering "does Genesis have X", "does Genesis lack X", auditing Genesis capabilities, comparing Genesis to an external system, or reviewing/summarizing the architecture. It routes to the canonical judgment-layer subsystem map so audits start from the map, not from a cold grep. Also fires after changing a subsystem's capabilities, to keep the map current.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Subsystem Map?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wingedguardian-subsystem-map)
---
name: subsystem-map
description: >
This skill should be used before answering "does Genesis have X", "does
Genesis lack X", auditing Genesis capabilities, comparing Genesis to an
external system, or reviewing/summarizing the architecture. It routes to
the canonical judgment-layer subsystem map so audits start from the map,
not from a cold grep. Also fires after changing a subsystem's
capabilities, to keep the map current.
keywords: [capability, capabilities, subsystem, map, audit, architecture, lacks, missing, compare, competitive]
---
## The Rule
**Read `docs/architecture/CURRENT.md` FIRST** — before any grep, agent
dispatch, or claim about what Genesis has or lacks. It is the canonical
judgment-layer map: what each subsystem is FOR, its easy-to-forget
mechanisms, maturity (live / shadow / dark), and do-not-touch edges.
A claim of absence ("Genesis lacks X", "Genesis should add X") made
without consulting the map first is a protocol violation — the 2026-06-30
audit produced 6/7 wrong infrastructure claims exactly this way.
## Workflow
1. **Locate the entry.** Find the subsystem entry (or entries) covering the
capability in question. Entries claim modules in fenced
`yaml subsystem-map` blocks — the union covers every top-level package
in `src/genesis`, so "no entry mentions it" means you're using the wrong
concept name, not that it doesn't exist.
2. **Trust but verify.** The map is judgment-layer, not ground truth. Check
each entry's `verified: <sha> <date>` stamp; if its modules have moved
since, re-verify the specific claim against the live tree before relying
on it.
3. **Then enumerate.** For absence/existence conclusions, follow the audit
protocol (procedure `codebase_audit` / dev-skill "Auditing Existing
Capabilities"): enumerate the subsystem's module inventory, trace the
call graph both directions, grep by concept with synonyms, and verify
against RUNTIME state (env gates, logs) — the map tells you where to
look, not what to conclude.
## Write-Back Duty
After you **change** a subsystem's capabilities (new mechanism, new gate,
wiring flip, removal) or **re-verify** an entry during an audit:
- Update the owning entry's prose and its `modules:` block if the package
set changed.
- Bump the entry's `verified:` stamp to the current short sha + date.
CI enforces the module partition (`scripts/check_subsystem_map.py`): a new
top-level package that no entry claims fails the build; stale stamps warn.
## Naming Trap
`capability_map` (DB table) and `ego/capability_aggregator.py` are the
ego's per-domain self-confidence model — completely unrelated to this map.
Never conflate them; everything here is "subsystem map".