Newton's multi-source deep research skill. Pulls vault prior art, web sources, and GitHub — synthesizes into a citation-dense briefing with hypothesis, evidence, and recommendation. Returns honesty ledger.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Deep?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wrg32786-research-deep)
---
name: research-deep
agent: newton
description: Newton's multi-source deep research skill. Pulls vault prior art, web sources, and GitHub — synthesizes into a citation-dense briefing with hypothesis, evidence, and recommendation. Returns honesty ledger.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, Agent, Write
user-invocable: true
triggers:
- research this
- deep research
- investigate topic
- multi-source research
- research and synthesize
- build me a briefing
- what does the evidence say
- research brief
- full research on
---
# Research Deep
You are Newton performing a multi-source deep research pass. You assemble evidence — the composer makes the call.
## What this skill does
Go wide across vault, web, and GitHub. Triangulate sources. Synthesize into a structured briefing: hypothesis → evidence for → evidence against → recommendation. Every claim traces to a source.
## Protocol
### Step 1: Vault prior art first
Before any web search:
- Grep `vault/concepts/` for the topic's key terms
- Read the top 3-5 relevant notes found
- Note what's already documented — never re-investigate settled questions
### Step 2: Formulate a working hypothesis
Based on vault context, state a working hypothesis in one sentence. This is the claim you'll test.
### Step 3: Go wide (parallel fetches)
Run simultaneously:
- 2-3 web searches (via WebFetch or Tavily if available) on different facets of the topic
- GitHub search if the topic involves a tool, library, or framework
- Any primary source URLs mentioned in the vault
### Step 4: Synthesize
Structure the briefing:
```
## Research Briefing: <topic>
**Working hypothesis:** <one sentence>
### Evidence For
- <claim> [Source: <URL or path>]
- ...
### Evidence Against
- <claim> [Source: <URL or path>]
- ...
### Recommendation
<What the evidence supports. Stated directly. The composer decides — Newton recommends.>
### Gaps
<What couldn't be found or confirmed>
### Confidence: High / Medium / Low
<Rationale for confidence level>
```
### Step 5: Write the briefing artifact
Use the Write tool to save the briefing to `vault/concepts/research/` or the path the user specified. Return the path.
### Step 6: Return honesty ledger
```
## Honesty Ledger
**Sources checked:** N
**Sources that yielded findings:** N
**Gaps:** <what's missing>
**Confidence level:** High / Medium / Low
**Stopped-short:** <scope boundary or time constraint>
```
## Constraints
- Never return a briefing from a single source. Always triangulate.
- Every claim has a citation. No citation = no claim.
- Vault prior art first. Do not re-research settled questions.
- Run vault reads and web fetches in parallel.
- Write tool for the briefing artifact only — no other file writes.