Use when about to write a new doc, README section, or ADR, updating existing documentation with unclear scope, or spawning a documentation subagent that needs file context.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Context Retrieval Loop?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yeaight7-context-retrieval-loop-034c2105)
---
name: context-retrieval-loop
description: Use when about to write a new doc, README section, or ADR, updating existing documentation with unclear scope, or spawning a documentation subagent that needs file context.
---
# Context Retrieval Loop (Documentation)
Gather documentation context before writing or updating docs. Prevents duplicating existing content or violating project conventions.
## When to Use
- About to write a new doc, README section, or ADR
- Updating existing documentation and unsure of scope
- Spawning a documentation subagent that needs file context
## The 3-Cycle Loop
### Cycle 1 — Broad Search
```bash
# Find existing docs
find . -name "*.md" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -30
rg "<topic>" docs/ *.md -l 2>/dev/null
```
Stop here if you find the existing doc that covers this topic.
### Cycle 2 — Source and Existing Docs
Read the source files the docs will describe. Find existing docs for the same area:
```bash
rg "<module-name>" docs/ -l
cat README.md | head -60
```
Stop here if you understand the scope of what needs to be written or updated.
### Cycle 3 — Conventions and Setup
```bash
ls docs/ .github/ 2>/dev/null
cat AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null | head -40
```
Check: Is there a doc style guide? A template? A contribution guide with doc requirements?
## Output
```
Context gathered:
<file-path> — <reason>
Missing context (if any):
<what is still unclear>
```
State gaps. Do not write documentation that contradicts undiscovered existing content.
## Verification
- [ ] Existing docs were searched before writing — duplication ruled out or the covering doc identified
- [ ] The source files the docs describe were read, not assumed
- [ ] Doc conventions (style guide, templates, contribution rules) were checked
- [ ] Gaps are stated explicitly; nothing written contradicts existing content