Skip to content
Back to skills

Requesting Code Review

ASecurity

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 29, 2026
ai-agentsshellcode-reviewgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 29, 2026

npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill requesting-code-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Requesting Code Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Requesting Code Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yeaight7-requesting-code-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yeaight7-requesting-code-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: requesting-code-review
description: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.
---

# Requesting Code Review

## Purpose

Dispatch a focused reviewer with enough context to catch bugs, requirement gaps, and risky assumptions before merge.

## When to Use

- After a major feature
- Before merge
- After a complex bug fix
- During multi-task execution when review checkpoints matter

## Requirements

Preferred inputs:

- local git range
- written requirements or plan

Helpful check:

```powershell
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
```

## Inputs

- What was implemented
- Requirements or plan
- Base and head revisions, if available

## Workflow

1. Get the git range when local git is available.

```powershell
git rev-parse origin/main
git rev-parse HEAD
```

2. Dispatch a reviewer using `references/code-reviewer.md`.
3. Include summary, requirements, and diff range.
4. Fix critical issues first, then important ones.

## Output

- strengths
- critical, important, and minor issues
- recommendations
- merge readiness assessment

## Verification

- [ ] Reviewer received requirements or plan
- [ ] Reviewer received a diff range or equivalent context
- [ ] Critical issues were not ignored
- [ ] Important issues were resolved or explicitly deferred

## Failure Modes

- skipping review
- incomplete diff context
- ignoring critical issues
- accepting feedback blindly

## Missing Dependency Behavior

If local git range is unavailable:

1. Say local git context is missing.
2. Ask for an explicit diff, patch, or file list.
3. Do not pretend a git-based review scope was provided.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…