Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Test Preserving Refactor?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yeaight7-test-preserving-refactor-agent-powerups)
---
name: test-preserving-refactor
description: Use when code needs restructuring and observable behavior must stay unchanged, with existing tests kept green at every step.
---
## Purpose
Refactoring is only safe if it is backed by tests. Work in a strict loop — green baseline, one structural change, immediate re-run, revert on red — so you are never trapped in an uncompilable state.
## When to Use
- Code needs restructuring (extract/inline/move) without behavior change
- A previous refactor spiraled into a broken, hard-to-recover state
- Tests covering the target area exist or can be run
## Inputs
- The target area and the command that runs just its tests
## Workflow
1. **Run tests first.** Before touching any code, run the tests covering the target area. They MUST be green. If they are red, stop and fix the tests (or the code) first:
```bash
npx jest path/to/target # or: pytest tests/test_target.py -q
```
2. **Small steps.** Make one structural change at a time (e.g., extract a method).
3. **Run tests immediately** after the single structural change. The per-change loop:
```bash
# repeat per structural change: edit -> test -> commit (green) | revert (red)
npx jest path/to/target && git commit -am "refactor: extract X" || git checkout -- .
```
4. **Revert on red.** If the tests fail, you made a mistake. Revert the change (`git checkout -- .` or `git restore .`) and try a different approach. Do not attempt to "fix" the refactor while tests are failing.
5. **Commit on green.** Once the small change is green, consider it a safe checkpoint.
This strict loop prevents you from getting trapped in an uncompilable state.
## Output
- A chain of small, individually green commits
- The final test run output proving unchanged behavior
## Verification
- [ ] Baseline test run was green before the first edit
- [ ] Exactly one structural change per test cycle
- [ ] Every red result handled by revert, not forward-fixing
- [ ] Each green step committed as a checkpoint
- [ ] No test was modified to make the refactor pass
## Failure Modes
- **Refactoring on red** — starting from failing tests means you cannot tell what you broke.
- **Step batching** — three changes per test run; when it fails, you don't know which one did it.
- **Forward-fixing a broken refactor** — "fixing" while red digs the hole deeper; revert is cheaper.
- **Bending the tests** — editing assertions to match new behavior is a behavior change, not a refactor.