Skip to content
Back to skills

Compare Evaluation Protocols

ASecurity

Build a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance.

  • 499 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
researchperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill compare-evaluation-protocols --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Compare Evaluation Protocols?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Compare Evaluation Protocols
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-compare-evaluation-protocols/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-compare-evaluation-protocols)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: compare-evaluation-protocols
description: "Build a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance."
---

# compare-evaluation-protocols

## Purpose

Build a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance.

## Input contract

```yaml
required: [protocol_records, metric_schema, comparison_target]
optional: [paired_results, sensitivity_assumptions]
constraints: [differences require explicit protocol fields and a comparable outcome]
```

## Procedure

1. Extract protocol elements into a normalized comparison schema.
2. Align datasets, populations, metrics, baselines, and evaluation conditions.
3. Mark differences and assess their plausible performance effect.
4. Separate observed effects from unresolved protocol confounding.

## Output contract

```yaml
produces: [protocol_difference_matrix, materiality_assessment, confounding_notes, comparability_judgment]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, open_questions]
```

## Quality gates

- The compared metric and target are held constant or explicitly qualified.
- Missing protocol fields remain visible.

## Failure and counterexamples

Do not attribute score differences to method quality when protocol differences are unmeasured.

## Provenance map

- `resolved: knowledge-acquisition-evaluation-protocol-comparison`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…