Skip to content
Back to skills

Condition Normalization

ASecurity

Compare and standardize experimental conditions across papers

  • 417 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added June 2, 2026
researchperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 2, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill condition-normalization --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Condition Normalization?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Condition Normalization
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-condition-normalization/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-condition-normalization)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: condition-normalization
description: Compare and standardize experimental conditions across papers
execution: tactic
used-by: baseline-establishment
---

# Condition Normalization


## Purpose

Build a structured understanding of how experimental conditions vary across papers, then define normalization schemes that enable fair method-to-method comparison. Addresses the fundamental problem that papers evaluate under different settings, making raw score comparison misleading.

## Stages

### Stage 1: Condition Extraction

For each method-paper pair, extract all evaluation conditions:
- Training data: size, version, preprocessing, augmentation
- Hardware: GPU type, memory, training time
- Hyperparameters: learning rate schedule, batch size, epochs
- Evaluation protocol: data split version, ensembling, post-processing
- Random seeds: number of runs, seed selection, variance reported

**Yield**: Condition vectors per method-paper pair.

### Stage 2: Difference Matrix

Build a matrix showing which conditions differ across methods:
- Identify dimensions with high variance across papers
- Identify dimensions that are controlled (same across all)
- Quantify the impact of each dimension on reported scores (if literature exists)

**Yield**: Condition difference matrix with impact annotations.

### Stage 3: Normalization Scheme

Define rules for adjusting scores to common conditions:
- Compute-normalized comparison (score per FLOP)
- Data-normalized comparison (score per training example)
- Time-normalized comparison (score per GPU-hour)
- Identify which normalizations are valid vs. speculative

**Yield**: Normalization rule set with validity bounds.

### Stage 4: Fair Comparison Baseline

Apply normalization to produce fair comparison subsets:
- Controlled comparison: methods evaluated under identical conditions
- Adjusted comparison: methods with score adjustments applied
- Pareto frontier: compute-vs-performance optimal set

**Yield**: Fair comparison tables with methodology notes.

## Minimum Yield

| Metric | Floor |
|--------|-------|
| Condition dimensions cataloged | 5 |
| Methods with full condition vectors | 10 |
| Normalization rules defined | 3 |
| Fair comparison sets produced | 2 |

## SOPs Used

- condition-cataloging (for Stage 1)
- compute-normalization (for Stage 3)
- performance-table-assembly (for Stage 4)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…