Skip to content
Back to skills

Construct Defense

ASecurity

Construct the strongest defensible case while acknowledging valid weaknesses.

  • 499 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
researchgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill construct-defense --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Construct Defense?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Construct Defense
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-construct-defense/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-construct-defense)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: construct-defense
description: "Construct the strongest defensible case while acknowledging valid weaknesses."
---

# construct-defense
## Purpose
Construct the strongest defensible case while acknowledging valid weaknesses.
## Input contract
```yaml
required: [position, evidence_set, objection_set]
optional: [defense_criteria, audience, weakness_policy]
constraints: [support must be evidence-linked and weaknesses cannot be erased]
```
## Procedure
1. State the position and burden of proof.
2. Select and order the strongest supporting arguments.
3. Address objections and reframe only where evidence supports the reframe.
4. Mark residual weaknesses and scope limits.
## Output contract
```yaml
produces: [defense_case, supporting_arguments, objection_responses, residual_weaknesses]
delta_fields: [findings, decisions, uncertainties]
```
## Quality gates
- At least 3 supporting arguments are supplied when evidence permits.
- At least 1 perceived weakness is tested for legitimate reframing.
- Every claim has an evidence or uncertainty link.
## Parameterization
Caller supplies position schema, evidence rubric, objection taxonomy, argument-count rule, and weakness policy.
## Failure and counterexamples
Reject hedged advocacy, unsupported reframes, or defenses that omit valid objections.
## Provenance map
- concept: stress-test/debate-defender
- concept: convergence/advocate-construction

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…