Skip to content
Back to skills

Evidence Linking Arg

ASecurity

Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting

  • 417 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 5, 2026
research

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 5, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill evidence-linking-arg --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Evidence Linking Arg?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Evidence Linking Arg
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-evidence-linking-arg/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-evidence-linking-arg)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: evidence-linking-arg
description: Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting
  evidence, create typed edges, assess evidence quality, identify gaps in evidential
  coverage.
execution: strategy
dependencies:
  tactics:
  - strength-assessment
  sops:
  - evidence-attachment
  - strength-scoring
---

# Evidence Linking (Argument)

Link evidence to claims with typed relationships. Searches for supporting and contradicting evidence, creates structured edges, assesses evidence quality, and identifies claims lacking sufficient evidential support.

## Budget Slice

| Metric | Small | Medium | Large |
|--------|-------|--------|-------|
| Evidence links created | 15 | 40 | 80 |
| Claims with evidence | 8 | 20 | 40 |
| Contradictions found | 2 | 6 | 12 |

## State Ledger

<HARD-GATE>
Print before every iteration:

| Metric | Target | Current | % |
|--------|--------|---------|---|
| Evidence links created | — | — | — |
| Claims with evidence | — | — | — |
| Contradictions found | — | — | — |
</HARD-GATE>

## Budget Gate

Cannot exit until 80% of budget targets met.

## Adversarial Completeness Probe

After budget gate passes, self-check:
- Are there claims with only supporting evidence (confirmation bias)?
- Are there high-confidence claims with weak evidence?
- Is evidence diversity sufficient (multiple independent sources)?

Max 2 extra iterations if gaps found.

## Tactics Available

- **strength-assessment** — evaluate the strength of evidence-claim relationships

## SOPs Available

- **evidence-attachment** — attach evidence to a claim with typed edge
- **strength-scoring** — assign strength scores to claims based on evidence

<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->

## Available Tactics

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

| Tactic | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| strength-assessment | Tactic for assessing argument strength — evaluate evidence quality, count independent sources, check for defeaters, assign calibrated confidence scores. |

## Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

| SOP | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| evidence-attachment | SOP for attaching evidence to a claim — create typed edge (supported_by, contradicts, qualifies) with evidence quality metadata. |
| strength-scoring | SOP for assigning calibrated strength scores to claims — evaluate evidence weight, count independent sources, check defeaters, produce scored assessment. |

<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…