Back to skills
SKILL.md
Stress Test Perspective Rotation
ASecurity'Tactic: Sequential perspective evaluation with divergence aggregation.
- 417 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 1 view
- Added September 5, 2026
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill stress-test-perspective-rotation --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Stress Test Perspective Rotation?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-stress-test-perspective-rotation)---
name: stress-test-perspective-rotation
description: 'Tactic: Sequential perspective evaluation with divergence aggregation.
Each agent evaluates from a distinct viewpoint, then disagreements are surfaced
and resolved.'
type: tactic
strategies:
- society-of-mind
- multi-perspective-panel
dependencies:
sops:
- confidence-calibration
- debate-architect
- divergence-detection
- perspective-critic
---
# Perspective Rotation Tactic
Sequential multi-perspective evaluation followed by divergence analysis and deliberation.
## Orchestration
1. **debate-architect** assigns N perspectives (domain expert, skeptic, practitioner, theorist, etc.)
2. [Parallel] Each **perspective-critic** evaluates artifact from assigned viewpoint
3. **divergence-detection** compares all evaluations:
- Identifies consensus points (agreement across >70% of perspectives)
- Identifies divergence points (disagreement across >50% of perspectives)
4. [Deliberation] Perspective-critics respond to divergence points
5. **divergence-detection** re-evaluates — tracks convergence trend
6. **confidence-calibration** determines if further rounds needed
## Perspective Types
- Domain Expert (technical validity)
- Methodological Skeptic (rigor and reproducibility)
- Practitioner (real-world applicability)
- Theorist (conceptual coherence)
- Adversary (strongest possible objection)
- Novice (clarity and accessibility)
## Subagents Dispatched
- debate-architect (perspective assignment)
- perspective-critic × N (evaluation from viewpoint)
- divergence-detection (agreement/disagreement mapping)
- confidence-calibration (convergence assessment)
## Termination Conditions
- Convergence reached (divergence points < 2)
- Max deliberation rounds exhausted
- Saturation detected (no position changes between rounds)
- Irreconcilable disagreement identified (flagged for human review)
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
## Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| confidence-calibration | Calibrates confidence scores based on debate progression. Determines whether to escalate, continue, or terminate based on cumulative evidence. |
| debate-architect | Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters. |
| divergence-detection | Identifies agreement and disagreement patterns across multiple perspective evaluations. Maps consensus clusters and persistent divergence points. |
| perspective-critic | Evaluates artifact from a specific assigned perspective. Produces assessment grounded in that viewpoint's values, priorities, and expertise. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…