Skip to content
Back to skills

Synthesize Literature Evidence

ASecurity

Build a reproducible literature evidence base. Scoping, systematic, deep, narrative, and snowball are execution modes selected from intent and budget, not separate strategy nodes.

  • 499 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
researchgonode

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill synthesize-literature-evidence --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Synthesize Literature Evidence?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Synthesize Literature Evidence
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-synthesize-literature-evidence/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-synthesize-literature-evidence)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: synthesize-literature-evidence
description: "Build a reproducible literature evidence base. Scoping, systematic, deep, narrative, and snowball are execution modes selected from intent and budget, not separate strategy nodes."
---

# synthesize-literature-evidence

## Purpose

Build a reproducible literature evidence base across scoping, systematic, deep, narrative, and snowball modes.

## Input contract

```yaml
mode_contracts:
  scoping:
    required: [research_question, evidence_scope, inclusion_rules]
    optional: [seed_sources, query_set, time_window]
    constraints: [abstract_or_metadata_orientation_only, declared_universe_and_coverage_ratio]
  systematic:
    required: [research_question, evidence_scope, inclusion_rules]
    optional: [seed_sources, query_set, time_window, quality_rubric]
    constraints: [preregistered_search_and_staged_screening, validity_audit_required, declared_universe_and_coverage_ratio]
  deep:
    required: [research_question, evidence_scope, inclusion_rules]
    optional: [seed_sources, query_set, time_window, quality_rubric]
    constraints: [full_text_extraction_required, method_and_result_fields_must_be_traceable]
  narrative:
    required: [research_question, evidence_scope, inclusion_rules]
    optional: [seed_sources, query_set, time_window, quality_rubric]
    constraints: [heterogeneous_evidence_must_remain_explicit, no_formal_pooling_without_compatibility]
  snowball:
    required: [research_question, evidence_scope, inclusion_rules, seed_sources]
    optional: [query_set, time_window, quality_rubric]
    constraints: [backward_and_forward_citation_expansion, independent_evidence_saturation_required]
```

## Execution protocol

Do not perform called SOP operations inline; each loaded SOP owns its contract and thresholds.

1. You MUST load skill `define-evidence-protocol` to define scope, queries, inclusion and exclusion rules, provenance, and stopping evidence.
2. You MUST load skill `select-seed-evidence` to select high-information seeds. You MUST load skill `categorize-evidence` to categorize the corpus.
3. Apply the selected mode's extraction, appraisal, normalization, hierarchy, screening, or citation operations.
4. You MUST load skill `assess-evidence-saturation` to assess whether new independent evidence has saturated.
   If the synthesis needs a formal domain structure, consider `build-domain-ontology`. If an apparent absence needs validation as a research gap, consider `validate-research-gap`. If the evidence should define a quantitative comparison baseline, consider `establish-empirical-baseline`. If claims and counterclaims need explicit support relations, `construct-argument-map` may be the better next tactic.

Deviation: Mode determines which steps are needed. Scoping may stop after broad coverage and screening; systematic mode requires staged screening and validity audit; deep mode prioritizes full-text extraction; narrative mode may omit formal meta-analysis; snowball mode requires citation tracing. Omitted calls remain optional vocabulary, not phantom dependencies.

## Mode branches

- `scoping`: map the breadth of a field and its terminology to establish coverage, candidate sources, and a defensible follow-up scope. You MUST load skill `canonicalize-entity` to normalize entities and terminology. You MUST load skill `construct-hierarchy` to organize the mapped breadth. You MUST load skill `screen-evidence-multistage` to apply the declared broad screening stages.
- `systematic`: apply preregistered search, staged screening, and validity audit so inclusion decisions are reproducible and complete. You MUST load skill `screen-evidence-multistage` to perform staged screening. You MUST load skill `extract-evidence-record` to extract the included studies. You MUST load skill `audit-study-validity` to audit their validity.
- `deep`: prioritize full-text extraction and detailed study appraisal when the question requires mechanism-level evidence. You MUST load skill `extract-evidence-record` to extract full-text records. You MUST load skill `audit-study-validity` to perform detailed study appraisal.
- `narrative`: organize heterogeneous evidence into a transparent interpretive synthesis when formal pooling is not appropriate. You MUST load skill `extract-evidence-record` to retain structured source records. You MUST load skill `canonicalize-entity` to align recurring entities. You MUST load skill `construct-hierarchy` to organize the narrative evidence.
- `snowball`: expand backward and forward citation neighborhoods from high-information seeds, stopping when new independent evidence saturates. You MUST load skill `trace-citation-neighborhood` to expand the citation neighborhoods. You MUST load skill `extract-evidence-record` to preserve each retained source.

## Output contract

```yaml
mode_contracts:
  scoping:
    produces: [field_taxonomy, key_authors_and_groups, research_trends, open_questions, deep_investigation_entry_points]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  systematic:
    produces: [prisma_flow, structured_comparison_tables, per_paper_quality_assessment, evidence_backed_gaps, synthesis_narrative]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  deep:
    produces: [method_comparison, extracted_equations_algorithms, implementation_details, evidence_cited_conclusions, open_questions]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  narrative:
    produces: [central_thesis, thematic_supporting_evidence, addressed_counterarguments, gap_or_opportunity, narrative_arc]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, hypothesis_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  snowball:
    produces: [seed_ancestor_map, seed_descendant_map, idea_evolution, branch_points, current_frontier, lineage_dag]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions, recommended_jumps]
```

## Thresholds and quality gates

- A-class acquisition gates use six fields: declared universe, numerator, batch increment, stopping reason, source references, and direction/threshold rationale.
- C3 landscape acquisition: assess-evidence-saturation compares marginal information gain of the current batch with the comparable prior batch; set-threshold supplies a justified relative coverage floor instead of 150 sources.
- C4 direction narrowing: use candidate-pool/evidence-hit and full-text coverage ratios with a justified threshold; do not retain fixed 80-paper/30-page counts.
- C19 survey modes: use marginal topic coverage and evidence gain for saturation; set-threshold supplies scale-relative full-text, independent-source, and screening-coverage floors.
- C20 snowball: use relative coverage of high-information/critical nodes and new independent-evidence rate; stop when added citation batches are saturated under the declared threshold.

## Failure and counterexamples

Do not call a synthesis systematic without an auditable screening flow, deep without explicit full-text fields, or saturated when the current and prior comparable batches have not been compared. Abstract-only conclusions must be marked limited.

## Provenance map

- `resolved: literature-survey`
- `resolved: knowledge-acquisition-scoping-survey`
- `resolved: knowledge-acquisition-systematic-survey`
- `resolved: knowledge-acquisition-deep-survey`
- `concept: narrative-survey`
- `concept: snowball-survey`
- `resolved: knowledge-acquisition-survey-synthesis`

## Preserved source criteria ledger

| source | source line | kind | source criterion |
|---|---:|---|---|
| scoping-survey | 4239 | numeric/textual | breadth/depth: 100 paper-overview / 20 paper-search / 0 paper-research; HARD-GATE each SOP row >=90%. |
| systematic-survey | 4246 | numeric/textual | 30 paper-research; HARD-GATE >=90%. |
| deep-survey | 4253 | numeric | 50% deep-read rate (20/40). |
| snowball-survey | 4330 | numeric/textual | backward/forward lineage, 67% deep-read, minimal web-search budget. |

## Context checkpoint / Delta notes

Append protocol, seed rationale, screening counts, extracted records, quality judgments, citation expansion, saturation calculation, and unresolved evidence questions.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…