Browse Secure Claude Skills
Search verified agent skills and review security grades before installing · full A–Z index
- Code ReviewReview code changes for concrete defects.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6,113
- Code ReviewExpert code review against architecture and coding standards: readability, maintainability, security, performance, layering, Sonar-equivalent cleanliness, comment and formatting discipline, modal safety, and a strict ban on raw SQL or database queries outside the persistence layer. Author/date file headers are identity metadata only and are out of review scope. Use when reviewing pull requests, developer diffs, or E2E Review phase outputs; produces approve/reject with actionable findings for ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Code ReviewerReviews code for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing code, performing security audits, checking for code quality, reviewing pull requests.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 416
- Review CodeReview code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 119
- Caveman Review超高压缩的 code review 留言。砍掉 PR 回馈的噪音，保留可运行的信号。 每则留言只有一行：位置、问题、修法。当用户说 "review this PR"、"code review"、 "review the diff"、"/review"，或调用 /caveman-review 时使用。 审查 pull request 时会自动触发。Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Code ReviewReviews code for quality, bugs, security issues, and best practicesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 19
- Code ReviewStructured code quality assessment with Conventional Comments format, scaled review depth, and soft-gating verdicts preserving user autonomy.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,760