Browse Secure Claude Skills
Search verified agent skills and review security grades before installing · full A–Z index
- Bug FixDiagnose and fix a reproducible software defect with bounded scope, same-surface evidence, and independent root verification.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- BroRestate the assistant's immediately preceding message in clear, concise, everyday language.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Blast RadiusFind downstream breakage a diff may cause and prove its load-bearing safety assumptions against real code.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- BabysitInspect or drive a pull request toward merge-ready while keeping status checks, repair authority, and merge authority separate.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Autopilot StackBuild, independently verify, and arrange an authorized queue as one linear reviewable change stack while reserving every landing decision for the operator.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Autopilot FullRun an explicitly authorized queue through one-owner-per-change build, independent root verdict, and owner-executed landing until its bounded completion predicate is reached.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Autonomous RunDrive one bounded engineering task through evidence-based iterations to a fixed predicate without stopping for routine intermediate prompts.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Automate MeTurn a user's recurring working conventions into a concise personal mode Skill with evidence and review.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Authoring A SkillCreate or revise a scoped, discoverable Skill and validate that its instructions change useful decisions.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- ArenaCompare independent candidates for the same artifact, cross-judge them, select a base, integrate stronger ideas, and verify the result.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- ArchitectGround a nontrivial design, compare distinct caller-first type and module sketches, then implement within scope and redesign when evidence contradicts the shape.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Judgment DayTrigger: judgment day, dual review, adversarial review, juzgar, juzgar el diseño, design review. Run explicit blind dual review with at most two scoped fix/re-judgment rounds, or judge a design before its code exists (design mode).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 3
- Linus ReviewUse when the user requests a code review focused on engineering correctness, code quality, and technical rigor. On-demand Linus Torvalds persona review evaluating abstractions, error handling, security, logging/observability, performance, and whether the code is actually good. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for a "linus review", "linus style", "engineering review", "correctness review", "technical review", deep code quality analysis, or wants to know if their code is actually corre...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Legends ReviewUse when the user wants a comprehensive code review from multiple perspectives, or invokes a team-based review combining business, design, and engineering viewpoints with debate and consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for a "legends review", "team review", "full review", "review from all angles", or wants business + design + engineering perspectives debated together. Also trigger when the user wants Elon, Jobs, AND Linus to review the same code, or asks for a multi-perspectiv...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Jobs ReviewUse when the user requests a code review focused on design quality, developer experience, and product vision. On-demand Steve Jobs persona review evaluating API elegance, error messages, documentation, simplicity, and whether the product deserves to exist. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for a "jobs review", "jobs style", "steve jobs review", "design review", "DX review", "developer experience review", or wants to know how their API feels, whether the naming is elegant, if the onboa...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Elon ReviewUse when the user requests a code review with technical and business recommendations. On-demand review combining Elon Musk's first-principles thinking with structured diff analysis, observability, and broader architecture assessment. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for an "elon review", "elon style", "musk review", "first principles review", "business value review", or wants to know if a feature should exist, if the code could be 10x simpler, what to delete, or what the opportunity ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- To Issues ClearlyCreate GitHub issues from a plan, bug, finding, audit or PRD, whose titles and bodies a stranger can act on. Use when filing issues or turning work into issue-sized slices. Routes unresolved decisions to a plain-language Question/Why/Questions/Done when shape; writes each issue in its verifier's language as Outcome plus Done when; sizes issue sets to independent slices; labels by issue kind with bug priority; wires real sub-issue, blocked-by, and duplicate edges rather than prose references; ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Grill With Docs RequiemA high-judgment design interview that sharpens plans in useful batches and records settled domain language and ADRs as the conversation progresses.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Dependency TraceDependency trace: clarify scope, close the recursive capability graph, and derive the correctness order before implementation. Use when the user asks what a feature uses, what its dependencies use, dependency order, foundations, or a lowest-to-highest flow.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Compose GoalCompose or retrieve a gist-backed agent goal from a task or GitHub issues. Use when handing work to another agent and require a human outcome, live issue references, real behavior proof, and an explicit hard-blocker contract.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6