Browse Secure Claude Skills
Search verified agent skills and review security grades before installing · full A–Z index
- Code ReviewerReviews code for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing code, performing security audits, checking for code quality, reviewing pull requests.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 416
- Safe Code Review 48Safe implementation of code-review operations.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 15
- Code ReviewReview code changes for correctness, maintainability, and operational risk.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Code ReviewReviews a diff for defects. Use when the user asks to review a pull request or inspect changes.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Code QualityReview maintainability or clean up comments in specified code without expanding the change's scope.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 62
- Code CriticDetect over-engineering and YAGNI violations. Stricter than /review. Use when asked to "critique my code", "find over-engineering", or "check for unnecessary complexity".Votes: 0GitHub stars: 76
- Code ReviewReview the diff, do NOT modify code: 1. Matches approved plan? 2. Unrelated files touched? 3. Duplication? Error handling? Edge cases? 4. Style consistent? 5. Silent API/schema changes? Report by severity, then recommended fixes.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Code ReviewPerform comprehensive code reviews focusing on best practices, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and maintainabilityVotes: 0GitHub stars: 7,231
- Code ReviewProactive code quality review. Triggers on significant code changes to check security, performance, architecture, and project patterns.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 34
- Code ReviewerComprehensive code review for quality, architecture, and performance. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing code quality, checking coding standards, evaluating design patterns, identifying performance bottlenecks, or analyzing technical debt. Triggers on "review", "audit", "analyze code", "check quality", "code smell".Votes: 0GitHub stars: 3
- Code ReviewerReview code for best practices, potential bugs, and improvements. Use when asked to review, analyze, or critique code quality.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 17
- Code Review 92Code Review ProtocolVotes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Code Review 116Review frontend code for best practices, bugs, and improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or before committing.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Safe Code Review 24Safe implementation of code-review operations.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 15
- Code ReviewPerform thorough code reviews focusing on unused code, duplications, coding patterns, bugs, and optimizations. Use when user wants code reviewed or audited. Read-only - outputs findings without making changes.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 37
- Review CodeReview code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 119
- Code ReviewPerform comprehensive code reviews covering bugs, style, performance, security, and best practices. Use this skill when the user mentions: review my code, check this code, code review, find bugs, improve code, refactor suggestions, security audit, performance optimization, code quality, static analysis.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 35
- Code ReviewUse when reviewing AI-generated code for architectural quality, design patterns, and engineering practicesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 13
- Code ReviewComprehensive code review with security, performance, and best practices focusVotes: 0GitHub stars: 3
- Code Review 3Reviews code changes for architectural fitness, extensibility, and alignment with design principles. Use when reviewing code, checking PRs, or validating implementations.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2