All authors
Claude Skills by yogsoth-ai
github.com/yogsoth-ai1,223 skills7 installs1,449 views
- Build Current Reality TreeBuild a sufficient-cause Current Reality Tree linking undesirable effects to a small root set.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Build Domain OntologyConstruct a tool-independent domain ontology: scope the domain, atomize concepts, type relations, build hierarchy, audit consistency, detect gaps, and refine confidence.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Build Failure ChainBuild multi-level cause -> failure mode -> effect chains and identify cascades/shared roots.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Build Noncircularity MatrixCross-tabulate target theory claims/assumptions against validator assumptions and mark independent, shared, derived-from-target, or unknown dependencies.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Calibrate Adversarial ConfidenceTrack confidence in competing claims/roles across adversarial rounds and update confidence only when evidence or argument quality warrants it.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Calibrate Probability ForecastAggregate and iteratively recalibrate probabilistic forecasts, preserving uncertainty, calibration evidence, and unresolved forecaster disagreement.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Canonicalize EntityResolve aliases and near-duplicates into canonical entities while preserving provenance and rejecting false merges; entity schema is configurable.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Categorize EvidenceCluster an evidence corpus by theme, method, chronology, mechanism, or another declared schema.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Challenge AssumptionConstruct a strong countercase or alternative to an assumption and assess consequence if it fails.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Characterize AnomalyPrecisely characterize an anomaly by contrasting observation with expectation, quantifying deviation where possible, recording conditions, and excluding obvious/trivial explanations before generating hypotheses.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Check DominanceIdentify Pareto-dominated and non-dominated alternatives under strict dominance.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Classify Assumption VulnerabilityClassify assumptions by load-bearing importance and vulnerability.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Classify ConstraintClassify constraints as hard, soft, or assumption-like after explicit identification.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Classify Falsification VerdictClassify a tested claim as BROKEN, CORROBORATED, or UNFALSIFIABLE based on whether a legitimate falsifier succeeded, failed under adequate power, or cannot be specified/reached.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Classify Research GapClassify a candidate research gap by type (evidence, method, mechanism, population, theory, measurement, contradiction, boundary, translation, etc.) and record implications for next actions.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Classify Simplicity EvidenceClassify simplicity/compression as earned, weak, or decorative based on whether it forbids alternatives, compresses independent facts, or merely renames/repackages them.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Classify Stakeholder SalienceClassify stakeholder salience using power, legitimacy, urgency, dependency, or a supplied salience schema.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Collect Independent JudgmentsCollect judgments/rankings from multiple genuinely independent evaluators or perspectives before exposing any peer outputs, preserving ballots and rationale for later social-choice aggregation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Compare Evaluation ProtocolsBuild a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Compare HypothesesBuild an explicit comparison matrix over hypotheses, predictions, and evidence.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Compare PairExecute one pairwise comparison under a specified criterion/model and return winner, confidence, and reasons.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Conceptual BlendingConstruct multiple input spaces, extract a shared generic space, selectively project structure into a blend, and simulate emergent properties that are not present in either source alone.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct Argument MapAtomize claims, expose premises and counterclaims, attach evidence/defeaters, score claim strength, and construct an inspectable argument graph independent of storage format.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct Causal ModelConstruct and validate an explicit causal model with measurable variables, mechanism edges, evidence links, feedback loops, interventions, counterevidence, and confidence.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct CounterfactualConstruct the minimally or explicitly intervened counterfactual world required by the parent analysis.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct CritiqueConstruct the strongest structured attack on a claim/artifact, grounded in explicit reasons/evidence.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct DefenseConstruct the strongest defensible case while acknowledging valid weaknesses.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct Design MatrixConstruct a balanced/randomized/orthogonal experimental design matrix appropriate to the chosen design mode.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct Evidence NetworkConstruct a network-meta-analysis evidence graph and evaluate connectivity/transitivity prerequisites.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct HierarchyConstruct an acyclic is-a/part-of/instance-of hierarchy with explicit roots, depth, and transitivity constraints.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct Input SpacesDefine the structured input spaces for conceptual blending: entities, relations, goals, constraints, and salient dynamics in each source.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct Perspective SetConstruct an explicit set of scientifically relevant viewpoints, roles, worldviews, stakeholder positions, or epistemic lenses to apply to the same object.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct ScenarioConstruct a scenario across key uncertainties with explicit assumptions and plausibility. Modes include baseline/narrative, counterfactual, and extreme-but-plausible worst-case with breaking point, failure cascade, recovery assumptions, and distinguishing observables.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Construct Validity EnvelopeSynthesize multi-axis breakpoints into a multidimensional statement of where a claim/method remains valid.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Counterfactual Causal AnalysisIntervene on factors, construct counterfactual worlds, test necessity/sufficiency, and identify load-bearing causal factors.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Coverage White Space SearchMap known methods against problem/parameter space and generate candidates from uncovered and weakly covered intersections. Acquisition mechanism is runtime-selected.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Cross ExamineProbe responses for inconsistency, logic gaps, and unsupported claims.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Decompose And Or GoalRecursively decompose a goal into an AND/OR DAG whose leaves are executable or testable subgoals.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Decompose ComponentsDecompose a system into components/functions and record dependencies relevant to transformation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Decompose Evaluation MetricDecompose an evaluation metric into rewarded signals, aggregation choices, polarity, ceiling effects, and Goodhart vulnerabilities.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Decompose Global SensitivityEstimate global main effects and interactions across uncertain inputs using screening/decomposition methods such as Morris→Sobol or an equivalent supplied method.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Decompose IshikawaBuild an Ishikawa-style causal decomposition across relevant cause families.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Decompose Research GoalTurn a research direction into an AND/OR goal DAG with testable leaves, dependency structure, and feasibility annotations.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Decompose Research QuestionDecompose a complex RQ into MECE subquestions, map dependencies, and schedule the answering order.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Define Analysis DimensionsIdentify approximately independent dimensions/axes that span the relevant problem, design, or validity space and define their semantics.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Define CriteriaDerive explicit evaluation criteria from the research objective and candidate set.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Define Evidence ProtocolDefine research questions, evidence scope, queries/concepts, inclusion/exclusion rules, provenance requirements, and stopping evidence for an acquisition task.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Define ObjectiveFormalize objectives, constraints, and tradeoff preferences for optimization.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Derive ConsequencesTrace logically valid consequences from an altered premise, provocation, or negated claim.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499
- Design Data ExtractionDefine a structured extraction form, field semantics, coding rules, and missing-data handling for evidence synthesis.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 499